JustanotherJane
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2008
- Messages
- 272
- Reaction score
- 0
Knowing the site you refer to, and it's "credibility issues", who knows? I did have a fleeting thought of something being put there (perhaps by a "player" and then relaying this tip through the site).Ok. This is really weird. In the pages and pages of "psychic" dreams and visions, there is bound to be something that makes a little sense, right? And, by sheer volume, something is bound to be right just based on statistics alone.
To understand my post, you'll have to remember that I searched the last time with TES. In my search, we found something and the area was blocked off by police tape immediately following the notification of our find. This was unusual because it was blocked off *immediately* and this was not done with anything else we found (and we found some other very suspicious things). I tried to return to the area after signing out with TES and I couldn't even get there because of the police tape. This find was different. People were crying...and then they called off the search for environmental reasons which just fueled everyone's "hinky" meter. I fully expected something to be on the news in the upcoming days or weeks. Obviously, nothing ever was so I figured it was nothing (well, not nothing, but not related to Caylee). Now...back to the lead:
Someone submitted a lead and referenced that predictions site that we aren't supposed to mention. In their lead, they mentioned that on that unmentionable site, it was suggested to search EXACTLY the area where we found something! And by exactly, I mean EXACTLY. Same road, same area of road, same landmark. I almost fell over when I read that. But, maybe because of my experience, I am reading too much into it. KWIM?
So...what does all that mean? The first thing it means is that I have to go dig through that other website to find this reference. Aside from that, it could mean that the "vision" was posted after the actual finding and that they had an inside tip about it or possibly the person who posted the "vision" was actually on the search with me (highly unlikely since it was a small group).
Now, if this "vision" was posted before the find actually happened, I will admit that my interest is peaked. Apparently, though, the find had nothing to do with Caylee (or did it and it will come out in the trial???).
I'm off to do some digging and will report back if I find anything.
I just checked that site. My stomach is churning. There are actual PHOTOS of the entrance to the area where we found something. They were posted in early August...we searched in late August. There is more than post in regards to this location. I'm going to take a shower...I don't want to get too worked up over this when it is probably nothing. On one hand, the area on a large scale has been mentioned a lot because of the cell pings. On the other hand, Orlando is huge, the area is huge...what are the chances of there being photos of the actual place that I posted about after my search? Especially since the information was posted before the search occurred?
I hope everyone starts getting on here soon...I know it is still early for those not on the East coast. I need some voices of reason!![]()
He was busted a while back for posting a lot of stuff "after the fact" just like you mentioned. Strange.