Tips to be released shortly

Ok. This is really weird. In the pages and pages of "psychic" dreams and visions, there is bound to be something that makes a little sense, right? And, by sheer volume, something is bound to be right just based on statistics alone.

To understand my post, you'll have to remember that I searched the last time with TES. In my search, we found something and the area was blocked off by police tape immediately following the notification of our find. This was unusual because it was blocked off *immediately* and this was not done with anything else we found (and we found some other very suspicious things). I tried to return to the area after signing out with TES and I couldn't even get there because of the police tape. This find was different. People were crying...and then they called off the search for environmental reasons which just fueled everyone's "hinky" meter. I fully expected something to be on the news in the upcoming days or weeks. Obviously, nothing ever was so I figured it was nothing (well, not nothing, but not related to Caylee). Now...back to the lead:

Someone submitted a lead and referenced that predictions site that we aren't supposed to mention. In their lead, they mentioned that on that unmentionable site, it was suggested to search EXACTLY the area where we found something! And by exactly, I mean EXACTLY. Same road, same area of road, same landmark. I almost fell over when I read that. But, maybe because of my experience, I am reading too much into it. KWIM?

So...what does all that mean? The first thing it means is that I have to go dig through that other website to find this reference. Aside from that, it could mean that the "vision" was posted after the actual finding and that they had an inside tip about it or possibly the person who posted the "vision" was actually on the search with me (highly unlikely since it was a small group).

Now, if this "vision" was posted before the find actually happened, I will admit that my interest is peaked. Apparently, though, the find had nothing to do with Caylee (or did it and it will come out in the trial???).

I'm off to do some digging and will report back if I find anything.

I just checked that site. My stomach is churning. There are actual PHOTOS of the entrance to the area where we found something. They were posted in early August...we searched in late August. There is more than post in regards to this location. I'm going to take a shower...I don't want to get too worked up over this when it is probably nothing. On one hand, the area on a large scale has been mentioned a lot because of the cell pings. On the other hand, Orlando is huge, the area is huge...what are the chances of there being photos of the actual place that I posted about after my search? Especially since the information was posted before the search occurred?

I hope everyone starts getting on here soon...I know it is still early for those not on the East coast. I need some voices of reason! :)
Knowing the site you refer to, and it's "credibility issues", who knows? I did have a fleeting thought of something being put there (perhaps by a "player" and then relaying this tip through the site).

He was busted a while back for posting a lot of stuff "after the fact" just like you mentioned. Strange.
 
Knowing the site you refer to, and it's "credibility issues", who knows? I did have a fleeting thought of something being put there (perhaps by a "player" and then relaying this tip through the site).

He was busted a while back for posting a lot of stuff "after the fact" just like you mentioned. Strange.
Given that we can't post the link, can someone post a couple of key words so that we can google and find what is being discussed?
 
After my shower, I've come to the conclusion that it has to be a coincidence. A big one, but a coincidence nonetheless. I'm going to try to let logic prevail. And besides, if our find HAD been significant and relevant to Caylee, TES would not be returning to search in what can be presumed to be an entirely different area. So, our find had to have not been related and the photo and location description(s) from the website had to have been a coincidence. Right? Right.

marellano - Don't get to freaked out. I looked around that site early on and I will say that I was a bit impressed in some of the work they did in trying to put locations together. BUT I also noticed, not a lot of the work was based on psychic intuition. It appeared to based more on information from people emailing in information and their feelings, and trying to identify water areas that were realistic, etc. Not really psychic but more investigative. And when the one and her team came to Orlando I think they searched a lot of these areas they were identifying on their site. Again, her work was not all that psychic.... she brought a cadaver dog, moved around based on "tips," etc.

I guess what I am saying is that it really isn't such a big coincidence that they located the area you searched. Like everyone, they were putting info together, working with maps, and evaluating ideas. They called it psychic, I called it exploring options. I thought they did a good job of exploring ideas at the time. I have not been there to read in months now so don't know what is being said.

Anyway.... while freaky on the surface, once you look at it, not so bad :)

Salem
 
Knowing the site you refer to, and it's "credibility issues", who knows? I did have a fleeting thought of something being put there (perhaps by a "player" and then relaying this tip through the site).

He was busted a while back for posting a lot of stuff "after the fact" just like you mentioned. Strange.


If this helps- that "crew" was down there at the same time and were doing daily radio shows, posting on the site, etc. Is this the same location where at a later time they said their dog hit on animal bones?
 
Does anyone know if the airport "sighting" was included in these tips? And did ws ever figure out if the poster that claimed to be the women was actually her?
 
After my shower, I've come to the conclusion that it has to be a coincidence. A big one, but a coincidence nonetheless. I'm going to try to let logic prevail. And besides, if our find HAD been significant and relevant to Caylee, TES would not be returning to search in what can be presumed to be an entirely different area. So, our find had to have not been related and the photo and location description(s) from the website had to have been a coincidence. Right? Right.

Not necessarily...........I do believe there are people who have psychic gifts, but the problem I see with most of them as they are so vague they are not definable even to the person seeing them. It is not like you watch a TV screen or google earth and "see" exactly where to go, but it they are in small pieces.

The problem with all these tips is some may be very valid, but they get buried in all of the crap. I did see one which was describing exactly where the witnesses saw KC, and described some other things very close.

I read some ridiculous ones, which should never have been wasting time but then again if you took some of them together, there might be in clue in them.
 
The one about Casey being Zannie and not knowing it, and the hypnotizing stuff: yep, to whomever said Law & Order. That was the episode where the redhead from Sex And The City played like she had different personalities to get away with murder... or something of that nature. Dollars to donuts: the caller fell asleep the previous night watching Law & Order with that episode playing... LoL

A little late, I know. but thank you. That drove me nuts last night... I knew I saw it, my dd was with me and she just looked at me like I was stupid last night when I asked her.
 
Knowing the site you refer to, and it's "credibility issues", who knows? I did have a fleeting thought of something being put there (perhaps by a "player" and then relaying this tip through the site).

He was busted a while back for posting a lot of stuff "after the fact" just like you mentioned. Strange.

Yes, but Marellano says the information was posted on this other site BEFORE her search even took place. Are you suggesting that the poster on the other site played around with the times for the posting to make it appear that it was posted prior to the actual search in which Marellano participated? Please clarify your point so that I may understand what you're saying. :)
 
What I don't get is all the people saying "I am not a psychic." Yet they are submitting tips that they got in a dream or a vision. What do they want to be called?
 
throw enough crap on a wall some of it is bound to stick. or should I say, talk about every road in town and speak of each and every tree one is bound to be the right road and the correct road on which you would find the body.

Nostradamus's writings could be consulted and I am sure you will find something that resembles the final location too!
 
Yes, but Marellano says the information was posted on this other site BEFORE her search even took place. Are you suggesting that the poster on the other site played around with the times for the posting to make it appear that it was posted prior to the actual search in which Marellano participated? Please clarify your point so that I may understand what you're saying. :)
Well, I'm saying perhaps something "hokey" is going on. B is a "dreamer" but maybe some of his postings were tips sent to him. I was just saying perhaps someone planted something, then sent him the tip. There has been, in the past, accusations of him manipulating his website to appear he had correctly predicted something and he was busted. I willl clarify that I haven't been to that site in ages, but IIRC one of the things he did was "sell" his dreams. He would sell you a package and then dream specifically for you. He would write down things and then send them to you. He was giving out numbers then too saying to bet on them in games of chance (Vegas and lottery). Just my 2 cents, he's a fraud.
 
I believe there genuinely are people who have psychic gifts, but the majority of these people are just off the wall nutcases.

I agree. It's too bad they didn't have a different phone number for psychics as opposed to those who actually saw with their own eyes a little girl they thought was Caylee (in a real setting with real people around). Imagine having to wade through this mess.

Kudos to OCSO who handled these. :blowkiss:

Modified: Just thought of something. Maybe you pushed 1 if you really saw her, 2 if you saw her in a dream, 3 if an animal was involved in any way ...
 
I

Modified: Just thought of something. Maybe you pushed 1 if you really saw her, 2 if you saw her in a dream, 3 if an animal was involved in any way ...

:rolling::rolling::rolling:
 
I saw a post a couple pages ago that some of these people should be locked up. I don't think that it should be illegal to call in a psychic tip, but I think there should be a law against calling a tipline to basically advertise for a particular psychic. Did you all see how many of those there were? People that had no info, off the wall or not, just wanting to tell LE to contact Sylvia or Brian because they are always right.
 
I will be the first to apologize if the peeing German Shepherds result in Caylee being found. Same with the leopard in the zoo tip or any of the others that I laughed at and/or made fun of.

Wouldn't someone who is not psychic chalk their dream of a missing person up to just being a dream?

I don't think that those who called should be locked up, but I think it would be helpful to LE to have a designated line for sightings of Caylee versus psychic information. Especially after reading some of these that were so vague there would be no way possible way to follow up on. JMO
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
157
Guests online
442
Total visitors
599

Forum statistics

Threads
627,104
Messages
18,538,485
Members
241,186
Latest member
Baffa_dbt
Back
Top