Titanic tourist sub goes missing in Atlantic Ocean, June 2023 #4

  • #121
TBH, this discovery is far more exciting to me, and I've talked before about my past obsessive interest in and deep knowledge of the Titanic. Sounds like they found something that changed the understanding of what was known to be possible to live and exist in the ocean at that depth, and that's remarkable.

MOO

And, it's such a recent discovery... only last year. Professor Murray Roberts (mentioned in my last post) is the coordinator for changing oceans/iatlantic involved in a 4-year study (that may or may not have involved more research near the Titanic in 2024 (maybe with OG?)... I haven't read enough to know or maybe they hadn't planned that far in advance. Or maybe it's all been scrapped now? Interesting stuff, nonetheless.


 
  • #122
Surprised they could not get a university sponsor (or a national government sponsor) if the scientific research at the Titanic wreck site is valuable. Instead, they charge "crew members" sans any kind of marine biology degree $250,000 a seat.

Something just seems "fishy". I still think the main focus was adventure hobby for the wealthy. There is, of course, nothing wrong with that.

It's possible (that despite the 2022 discovery) there were no sponsors willing to pay for safety certification? And/or maybe SR didn't want to wait for safety certification (which likely could have involved time and even more money for costly upgrades/materials). It sounds like (imo) everyone made choices... so sad they were fatal choices.
 
  • #123
I didn't realize until last night, there are pieces of the Titanic (like wood shards) for sale on ebay - along with the typical Titanic replicas, 1912 news reports, etc.
 
  • #124
I believe the sub used on the Back to the Titanic dives was the Triton 36000/2:


It's in a completely different league to the Titan. It's rated to 11,000m (36,000ft) and has been pressure tested to 14,000m (46,000ft). To put that into perspective, Titanic is only 3,800m (12,500ft) down. Triton can go all the way down to the bottom of the Challenger Deep.

Even if Titan had been built properly to withstand the pressure at 4,000m, it wouldn't have been directly comparable to the Triton. Triton is the absolute best-of-the-best.
I hear you. Both the support ship, Pressure Drop, and the submersible, Limiting Factor, were significantly more high tech and probably cost way more.

OceanGate received 447k from a PPP loan to cover salaries and about 18.1 million from two investors plus additional funding totaling 37 million. I don’t know how much it cost to build either submersible but my guess is a heckuva lot.

In the show I’m watching they noted that during a 2005 dive Titanic was in good shape but had significantly deteriorated by the 2019 dive. The microbiologist described bacteria at work which she called “rustickles.”

So while I still feel Rush should have conducted proper testing I’m starting to understand his urgency of getting his submersible up and running before Titanic disappears into the ocean floor.

 
  • #125
Good grief, he answered his own question:

The listening system is (was) super secret and the military did not want to drop hints about its existence or capabilities.

So, yes.... they allowed the Coast Guard search to continue despite knowing that it was very likely futile.

I think that super secret military listening system is a whole lot of hooey. :(
 
  • #126
USCG commences Marine Board of Investigation:
WASHINGTON – The Coast Guard convened a Marine Board of Investigation (MBI) into the loss of the Titan submersible and the five people on board. The crew of the Polar Prince research vessel lost contact with the Titan submersible 1 hour and 45 minutes into its dive on Sunday, June 18, 2023. After an extensive search and rescue effort, wreckage of the Titan submersible was located on the ocean floor approximately 500 meters off the bow of the Titanic.


An MBI is the highest level of investigation in the Coast Guard. Upon completion of the investigation, the Board will issue a report to the Commandant with the evidence collected, the facts established, its conclusions, and recommendations.

During the course of the MBI, the Board will work to determine:
  • The cause of the casualty, including the cause of any death.
  • Whether an act of misconduct, incompetence, negligence, unskillfulness, or willful violation of law committed by any individual licensed, certificated, or documented has contributed to the cause of the casualty, or to a death involved in the casualty, so that appropriate remedial action may be taken.
  • Whether an act of misconduct, incompetence, negligence, unskillfulness, or willful violation of law committed by any person, including an officer, employee, or member of the Coast Guard, contributed to the cause of the casualty, or to a death involved in the casualty.
  • Whether there is evidence that an act subjecting the offender to a civil penalty under that laws of the United States has been committed, so that appropriate action may be undertaken to collect a penalty.
  • Whether there is evidence that a criminal act under the laws of the United States has been committed, so that the matter may be referred to appropriate authorities for prosecution.
  • Whether there is need for new laws or regulations, or amendment or repeal of existing laws or regulations, to prevent the recurrence of the casualty.

The Coast Guard MBI is working in close coordination with other national and international authorities including the United States National Transportation Safety Board, Canadian Transportation Safety Board, French Marine Casualties Investigation Board, and United Kingdom Marine Accident Investigation Branch.
 
  • #127
I think that super secret military listening system is a whole lot of hooey. :(

It does exist and it isn't exactly a secret. The navy has had a sub detection system since the 1950s. The system was revealed after the Cold War, although of course its current capabilities are still highly classified.

 
  • #128
I didn't realize until last night, there are pieces of the Titanic (like wood shards) for sale on ebay - along with the typical Titanic replicas, 1912 news reports, etc.
How the heck did people get hold of wood shards? From what? I call fake.

Lol, I have an old book about the sinking, dated April 18, 1912, four days later! Kind of like the 20th century Daily Mail.

There have been multiple claims of ownership of Titanic salvage over the years including insurance companies.

My understanding is that the only remaining controversy is over the Marconi wireless.
 
  • #129
How the heck did people get hold of wood shards? From what? I call fake.

Lol, I have an old book about the sinking, dated April 18, 1912, four days later! Kind of like the 20th century Daily Mail.

There have been multiple claims of ownership of Titanic salvage over the years including insurance companies.

My understanding is that the only remaining controversy is over the Marconi wireless.

Fake was my first thought, also. From the photos, there appears to be an accompanying RMS Titanic "certificate of authenticity". This may have been something sold to the general public during "RMS Titanic" traveling exhibition tours. I really have no idea.

Here's a link to one (there are others listed too)

 
  • #130
Fake was my first thought, also. From the photos, there appears to be an accompanying RMS Titanic "certificate of authenticity". This may have been something sold to the general public during "RMS Titanic" traveling exhibition tours. I really have no idea.

Here's a link to one (there are others listed too)

It’s selling for $97.00. Yeah, no.
 
  • #131
It’s selling for $97.00. Yeah, no.

'Next thing we know there will be a listing for a splinter from Elvis' big toe... complete with gold frame ;)

(Sorry, I couldn't stop myself from adding some bad humor to this very sad thread)
 
  • #132
Fake was my first thought, also. From the photos, there appears to be an accompanying RMS Titanic "certificate of authenticity". This may have been something sold to the general public during "RMS Titanic" traveling exhibition tours. I really have no idea.

Here's a link to one (there are others listed too)

In the description of the item you linked to it says the wood was collected in 1912, floating on the surface, by one of the ships that collected bodies in the days after the sinking.

Items such as pieces of wood, lifejackets, deckchairs etc. were collected from the surface, so it's not completely impossible this piece of wood is real... but I don't see how it can ever be proven.

At least they're not claiming it was ever on the ocean floor.
 
  • #133
I didn't know about this either

The piece was made by Samuel Smith who was on board the S.S. Minia that took part in the body-recovery mission in April 1912.
It has remained in his family ever since.
The cross is being sold along with other Titanic items at Henry Aldridge and Son auction house in Wiltshire and is expected to fetch £18,000.


 
  • #134
  • #135
TBH, this discovery is far more exciting to me, and I've talked before about my past obsessive interest in and deep knowledge of the Titanic. Sounds like they found something that changed the understanding of what was known to be possible to live and exist in the ocean at that depth, and that's remarkable.

MOO

I know Halifax, Nova Scotia is a long, long way from Australia, but I’ve posted somewhere earlier that the Maritime Museum there has a striking collection of Titanic artifacts which drifted there after it shipwrecked.

No treasure hunting, no profiteering, no grave desecration. Just what the ocean brought to them. There are deck chairs, furniture, baby shoes and many more items.

We had a lovely tour guide through the museum, (not a docent, I don’t think). She explained how these items came to Halifax and how tenderly everything was treated.

I am certainly aware that it’s an exhausting trip from where you are! Obviously though it’s a doable trip compared to diving down to the wreck. I hope you get to go, if that’s something that interests you.

Maybe there’s some Commonwealth-to-Commonwealth special deal???????? :)
 
  • #136
Dear Websleuths Members and Guests,
My apologies for interrupting your discussion.
Because of the downturn in advertising, we are short on the server payment.
We need to raise $1,700 this upcoming week or the server will be shut off.
Please know I hate asking but I am left with no choice.
Below are the ways you can donate
PayPal Pay Websleuths.com, LLC using PayPal.Me
Venmo name Tricia-Griffith-14
OR
Cash App $tgrif14
THANK YOU
Zelle use [email protected]
Be sure and put "server" in the memo.
The ad revenue is growing but it is growing slowly. I am hoping I don't need to ask you again.
Please, only donate if you can afford to do so. DO NOT DONATE ONE PENNY UNLESS YOU ARE SURE YOU CAN.
Thank you, everyone. I appreciate your help.
If you have questions please do not post them on this thread. CLICK HERE and that will take you to the thread where you can ask questions.
Take Care,
Tricia Griffith

Owner/Websleuths.com
 
  • #137
I know Halifax, Nova Scotia is a long, long way from Australia, but I’ve posted somewhere earlier that the Maritime Museum there has a striking collection of Titanic artifacts which drifted there after it shipwrecked.

No treasure hunting, no profiteering, no grave desecration. Just what the ocean brought to them. There are deck chairs, furniture, baby shoes and many more items.

We had a lovely tour guide through the museum, (not a docent, I don’t think). She explained how these items came to Halifax and how tenderly everything was treated.

I am certainly aware that it’s an exhausting trip from where you are! Obviously though it’s a doable trip compared to diving down to the wreck. I hope you get to go, if that’s something that interests you.

Maybe there’s some Commonwealth-to-Commonwealth special deal???????? :)
It's unlikely to happen - I'm poor and scared of flying. New Zealand's the furthest I've been and it was incredibly difficult for me to grit my teeth through those flights. I can't imagine flying round half the world. Sounds like an amazing museum, though. I'm glad you had a great experience there.
 
  • #138
  • #139
The director’s theory might sound bizarre at first, but Cameron believes that if the TItanic’s captain had made the decision to evacuate the travelers onto the iceberg itself, they may have survived long enough for rescue to come and save them. Speaking to a panel of experts for National Geographic (via YouTube), Cameron claimed: “My first favorite idea is to put everybody on the iceberg.” He goes on to argue that since the iceberg is the only thing that’s guaranteed not to sink, it’s the safest place for the residents of the ship to be awaiting help.

The director acknowledges that his theory isn’t completely safe, but he argues that it’s the most logical way to ensure those travelers aren’t forced into waters that will undoubtedly kill them overnight. He argues that access to the iceberg would be simple enough since the ship “just ran into it,” so the actual logistics of evacuating wouldn’t be too difficult. It’s obviously a flawed plan, but as all experts on the panel agree, there was no completely safe method of survival on that ship.
 
  • #140

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
137
Guests online
2,708
Total visitors
2,845

Forum statistics

Threads
632,083
Messages
18,621,804
Members
243,017
Latest member
thaines
Back
Top