Fantastic New Yorker article.
Interviews and e-mails with expedition leaders and employees reveal how OceanGate ignored desperate warnings from inside and outside the company. “It’s a lemon,” one wrote.
www.newyorker.com
Very interesting.
If we don't make any conclusions today, it will be happening more and more, world-wide, because of cost-cutting. I mean it. It is everywhere, and we all know it.
Several aspects.
1) Rush's personality. Two founding fathers in the line already means, some relatives who were on the extreme of the Bell curve. Otherwise they won't have signed the Declaration. We have a chance of top 2% in certain qualities, be it good or bad (likely, good in certain situations, but not in all).
Then an oil tycoon. Again, probably top 2% in entrepreneurial qualities. With time, you can get the offspring like Rush who could probably function well in extreme situations and yearning for them. But also, wanting only to be the boss. However, constructing a sub is not extreme. Engineering is not an extreme job, rather, tedious and obsessive. Maybe here the problem lies. Too much passion, not enough obsession? And I, for one, believe that Rush was smart, maybe a tad intense to be an engineer.
2) I understand Rush came from a wealthy family. It doesn't mean he was expected into channel his kids' inheritance into the sub. Here is where someone has to tell us, what exactly did he have to build a prototype submersible, and what he needed to have. I read that he collected about 18.5 mln according to old articles; question is, how much does it cost to develop a prototype sub and run all the tests? Probably way more but I am not a sub designer. I would not be surprised if he had a shoestring budget, and this is where the main problem lied.
3) the salary mentioned. $ 15. We are talking about pre-Covid time but of WA with high excise taxes. Plus, lots of other taxes. I can't blame Rush for trying to cut cost here because business in WA is expensive. Ask any constructor. WA is another California. Well, almost. At the same time, Rush had to have a connection to WA, for obvious reasons. Hence, no older constructors but kids who'd work or intern for $15/hr.
4) what they finally said in the article. No one wanted to have Rush as an enemy because of his connections. That, and probably lack of some laws regulating the underwater travels business. If there were laws, people would be more scared of breaking them than of crossing Rush. But probably there are not enough regulations, so who cares if this well-connected passionary submerges to the depth he shouldn't be at and takes other people living fast lives with him? Until he takes someone obviously unaware of the risk.
And now, not only senseless deaths, not only grieving relatives, but what about his own family? Even the family name. What about those young people hired at $15 to build the machine, their future employment? What about any industry not using but planning to use carbon fibers? (I never knew how they looked, but parts of bike are made of them, so you get the idea).
So I think the situation requires an in-depth analysis. It is the same in many areas. Everything goes well and cool, then one mistake, usually of cost-cutting type, followed by a ton of lawsuits, then the program is closed. How to avoid it?