TN - Chris Newsom, 23, & Channon Christian, 21, murdered, Knoxville, 6 Jan 2007 #7

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #341
Her testimony has been rehearsed. Q and A is too smooth.
 
  • #342
Gezzz what is she going to say the DNA is not Davidsons?
 
  • #343
The defense is really tilting at windmills, just smearing just to smear. There is no direct testimony that anyone (who isn't obviously confused and wacked) that Channon ever used drugs or knew Davidson or got drugs from Davidson. And if she did any and all of that, so what?! I bet the jury is starting to think the same way. All this IMPLICATION is just annoying. There is testimony that Channon was going on a date with Chris, leaving from the same apt where Davidson was expected to arrive at about the same time. There was testimony that she ended up at his house brutalized and dead, that Chris ended up raped and dead a little way away, and Davidson had possession of their clothes and other objects. Witnesses have put him at his house during the crime inspite of his denials. By his own words, he saw the victims and Channon told him she didn't want to die. His DNA was in her vagina and anus and on her clothing found at his house. His prints are on one or more of the in which Channon died after trussed and placed into. There is no testimony about or indication of the possibility of consensual sex between Channon and Davidson. If there were, there is still major evidence that Davidson killed her anyway, or participated in her killing. Still worried that no one will be convicted of killing trust.

Exactly. JURORS will be irked by defense's reaching too yo' no doubt.

:parrot:
 
  • #344
She's testifying on STR and YSTR dna analysis. ME testified in the Cobbins trial that YSTR dna testing would not have made sense or been beneficial in this case.
 
  • #345
More coffee plez muffet... having trouble following Mr Hairsplitter here

:parrot:
 
  • #346
TOTALLY robotic and rehearsed. R2D2

:parrot:
 
  • #347
  • #348
Usually, I just don't care about defense attorneys. They might be annoying or amusing, but these two are hideous, and I find myself actually despising them. In stead of trying to get a fair trial for their defendants, they are trying to get him off at any cost. That is not truth. That is not justice. That should NOT BE the American way. If these animals gets the other animal off, they should be forced to move him in next door to them and their families. These guys may be for themselves and for their own agrandizement, but they aren't fair or just. They don't stand for human rights, because they abuse the human rights of others to stand for the human rights of this sleezoid by inuendo slimey implication. IMO, all of the men sitting at the defense table are hideous creatures!
 
  • #349
The defense is really tilting at windmills, just smearing just to smear. There is no direct testimony that anyone (who isn't obviously confused and wacked) that Channon ever used drugs or knew Davidson or got drugs from Davidson. And if she did any and all of that, so what?! I bet the jury is starting to think the same way. All this IMPLICATION is just annoying. There is testimony that Channon was going on a date with Chris, leaving from the same apt where Davidson was expected to arrive at about the same time. There was testimony that she ended up at his house brutalized and dead, that Chris ended up raped and dead a little way away, and Davidson had possession of their clothes and other objects. Witnesses have put him at his house during the crime inspite of his denials. By his own words, he saw the victims and Channon told him she didn't want to die. His DNA was in her vagina and anus and on her clothing found at his house. His prints are on one or more of the in which Channon died after trussed and placed into. There is no testimony about or indication of the possibility of consensual sex between Channon and Davidson. If there were, there is still major evidence that Davidson killed her anyway, or participated in her killing. Still worried that no one will be convicted of killing trust.

Thank you, yolorado. I was hoping you'd put the outrage into words for us, as well as you always do.

I'm steaming more today than at any time before in this trial. :no:
 
  • #350
Edridge getting animated. His hand waving and swaying reminds me of a band conductor.
 
  • #351
Dna expert witness continues to be queried re dna in panties. Mixture of two individuals. All five "known samples" (perps, incl'g LD) were excluded she testifiess.

:parrot:
 
  • #352
Gosh, I suddenly have heartburn. I wonder what caused that?
 
  • #353
  • #354
Asking whether rectal swab of Chris was tested. Witness says profile obtained was victim's own. All others excluded.

:parrot:
 
  • #355
More coffee plez muffet... having trouble following Mr Hairsplitter here

:parrot:
:coffee:

My ADD brain can never stay focused on Eldridge's dodging and weaving or smoke blowing. :rolleyes:

I'm trying to cool down, in faith that this jury is smart enough to see that he's just grasping at straws to imply that there's something there.
 
  • #356
Well if I was a juror, I'd have to be thinking that Gutter and Rome invited two of their homies in to participate in a gang rape. IMO, doesn't make Gutter look good at all.
 
  • #357
Muffet I'm sure the parents are feeling much the same way, today only adds unbearable insult to the unimaginable injury.

:parrot:
 
  • #358
  • #359
Pros cross. TBI tech sitting with prosecution at their table.
 
  • #360
Pros getting witness to admit how one dna profile overwhelms other dna profiles.

The witness is no longer a rehearsed program robot. She's stuttering.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
129
Guests online
3,439
Total visitors
3,568

Forum statistics

Threads
632,633
Messages
18,629,486
Members
243,231
Latest member
Irena21D
Back
Top