- Joined
- Jan 28, 2015
- Messages
- 1,140
- Reaction score
- 5,835
then how do they ever find out if someone turned in a tip or if he has been found?
Well, that’s the rub. If the family hasn’t submitted DNA, then it would be very difficult to confirm any matches. Presumably potential matches could be excluded based on other factors like age or sex. That assumes Dennis didn’t make it to adulthood, of course.
the John Doe DNA wasn't viable. I want to assume this will all be handled,
Can you clarify what you mean by ‘handled’ in this context? If you mean something like ‘they’ll try extracting it again sometime”, I’d think it would be dependent upon why the sample wasn’t viable to begin with (too little? too degraded? Something else?)
With DNA - my limited and perhaps incorrect understanding of NamUs is that they can sort of auto- exclude based on DNA, assuming a missing person and an unidentified person both have DNA submitted to NamUs.
That said, even when people have submitted matches that turn out to be correct, they a) usually don’t get any sort of acknowledgement and b) it’s often a long time later that the match is made public. If it’s not a match, if they’re lucky, the case manager might provide a tidbit of previously unknown info - like, this person has been excluded, even though they don’t appear on the exclusions list in NamUs.
how long would this take?
I don’t want to be discouraging here, but I wouldn’t expect quick results for anything. And by ‘quick’ I mean say, less than a year. ‘how long does it take’ isn’t something we can answer, but it’s likely somewhere in the range of ‘a long time’, sorry to say.