I'm frustrated with certain particulars regarding the case as well, and I think some of the criticisms of community politics are valid, but I am very concerned about the developing negative portrayal of our local LE in various media outlets, including WS. If we want them to eventually be successful in supporting a prosecution of this case against the appropriate party, we are not helping the cause by portraying them as incompetent and unconcerned. After all, they are what we've got, and maybe they'll do a better job if we can support and encourage them now. Just possibly they are doing a better job than they are getting credit for--just behind the scenes.
I think the game plan has changed in a huge way, since the initial stages of the case where the goal was to bring the case to the spotlight quickly. At that time, it was a "search and rescue" mission. Now that most people believe that is no longer realistic, techniques need to change.
In my opinion, this is just not the time and place for pointing out all the flaws with our town government. That can all happen in a different forum, perhaps within the community and through our elected officials. :twocents:
Pearl, I understand your concern, but these problems have been going on for a long time, and it's sad that it takes a case such as this to bring it to people's attention. It shouldn't take a tragedy to open people's eyes to the fact that the majority of the SMPD (not every one, but many of them) are bullies. They've gotten away with it for years, and though I can understand the concern about Arlene saying too much to the media... but... when you've been fully searched, accused of drug use when you don't use drugs or drink at all for nothing more than driving with an expired tag, or get tailed from one end of the city limits to the other for years for apparently nothing more than entertainment of law enforcement when you have children in the car, then you form a very negative opinion of our department.