This is snipped from a post by Frogzilla quoting Clint (in the Sun):
Clint,"As I was writing my statement, I guess I kind of had a feeling that we might not get Holly back right away," Clint said. "So I was trying to preserve the crime scene and keep it from being disrupted because I knew the only thing we might have would be footprints, and I knew if someone stepped on them, then that's ruined."
The description of the suspect (by Clint in which I will attempt to paraphrase). Clint told LE the suspect may be or maybe not wearing a hat and gloves & had no concrete physical description of the suspect's appearance which to me is unsettling. Let me explain ....when writing a statement you need to have a kernel of certainty that you anchor onto. This is my opinion.... but a story unravels when retelling the events and everything is intentionally vague. The fact he is so sure it was Drew ...yet when he does have the opportunity to see
the retreating back of the suspect he
cannot give one single bit of helpful
information except a height and weight and clothing which fits almost every turkey hunter that morning. :waitasec:
Another red herring(in my opinion) is his conviction that as he observes Holly being abducted
instead of pursuing the kidnapper...he ponders the possibility that Holly is going to be gone for some time according to his written statement ...quoted
above. :twocents:
All of this is my opinion. I would like to believe that there are many others who have been talking to LE and have offered helpful information to help find Holly.
MOO