I do not doubt your logic, and what you bring up does tend
to happen a lot more than we would like to believe,. . .
Thank you for the kind response.
Frogzilla said:
. . .If you believe that she was abducted during the time
she would normally walk out her door and walk to her car in the morning,
would you not agree a prowler type of person would of needed to be at
the right spot at the right time with the mindset of abducting anybody
that spots them and the ability to remove a person from their property in
a timely fashion, which is much harder than an inanimate object. . .
Let me break this quote down into smaller parts to better respond to
particular points.
Frogzilla said:
. . .If you believe that she was abducted during the time
she would normally walk out her door and walk to her car in the morning, . . .
I think it likely this was her usual approximate time to leave
since her dad made some remarks (in news reports) about the perp
probably knew the family's routine.
Frogzilla said:
. . .would you not agree a prowler type of person would
of needed to be at the right spot at the right time . . .
Sure, he must have been there at the right approx. time but consider that
he might have been out hunting and/or out stealing early in the morning
and so that time of morning just naturally was when he would be there.
Perhaps he saw the others leave and then thought anyone left would
probably sleep in until a late hour. Either way his being there at that time
of day can be accounted for by either hunting and/or thieving.
I am not saying it can not have been a plan to abduct but just that there
is nothing to indicate it so far.
Frogzilla said:
. . .Also consider where this house is. It is in the middle
of nowhere. I find it hard to believe somebody would stumble upon it,
someone would probably need to target this house specifically.
A hunter could happen onto it. But I agree that it is also possible the
property was targeted on purpose. Perhaps he wanted to look it over for
a possible burglary attempt later.
Frogzilla said:
. . .with the mindset of abducting anybody
that spots them . . .
Not sure we can draw many conclusions
about mindset. He might have just panicked but I admit I too wondered
why he did not just run away once she spotted him on the property
and it made me think perhaps he was afraid of her getting out the alarm
too soon and her being able to ID him if he is caught.
So why be worried about a simple tresspassing charge?
Perhaps he was already on parole.
Perhaps he had a methlab thing going on at home & did not want that
found out which might result in actual prison time.
Perhaps he thinks he is wanted for a murder or other serious crime
elsewhere and thus can't afford to be caught.
Frogzilla said:
. . .and the ability to remove a person from their property in
a timely fashion, which is much harder than an inanimate object. . .
She walked away with him. Having drawn her blood and scared her
enough it seems she was quite docile and mobile for him as
evidenced by the eye witness account (The eye witness having seen her
appearing docile and mobile.) and by the fact that the two
got out of the area quietly and easily (relatively speaking.)
Note: Thank you again for the thoughtful post. I enjoyed reading your
points and I continue to think about them.
Hopefully the truth will come out in time and I hope to learn from the
case outcome.