Tom Cruise/Katie Holmes/Scientology - MERGED THREADS

[Thinkoflaura]

Looks real, right position for full term pregnancy too. No sign of the fake belly button. She has an innie.
Although, dear lord, why is she wearing jeans about to fall off and why would she be exposing her body like this is beyond me. What a tacky tacky photo.
She also looks out of breath in the photo to me, consistent with late pregnancy.

Commentary about the photo says it was taken in early MARCH. Notice how the baby has already dropped.
She's got MAJOR stretch marks too.

I think she's already had the baby,was probably days away from it at the time of the photo you found. Everything since then has been a lie.
Oh, and one thing before then is: the little bugger's paternity.

Uh oh, I've found a picture of a real tummy exposed by that nasty wind that seems to blow around Katie almost constantly. This was first published on April 6. What the heck does this do to our conspiracy pregnancy theories????

http://socialitelife.com/2006/04/06/the_baby_might_be_real.php

 

[Tristan]

Well, the belly certainly looks real in that picture....but when is she having this baby?? If it doesn't come out by late May....I'm really gonna start to wonder!! LOL

 

[Perry]

Has it been discussed how much her former fiancee Chris Klein resembles Tom Cruise? Wonder if he could be the Stud?:loser:

 

[HeartofTexas]

I've found a post on the same website as referenced in post #319 above that has me howling! This is in reference to the picture where it looked like she had a basketball shoved up under her shirt when the wind blew her blouse up.

Maybe she has already had it, but the baby came out and attacked everyone in the delivery room, and now Tom has it locked in a cage in the compound, and he doesn't want everyone to panic knowing his alien spawn was a horrible homicidal mutant, so he has perfected his Katie-bot to walk around with this fake bump so that no one will be any the wiser. Time to pack up your and head for the hills, folks. They're here..........


Posted on April 6, 2006 09:41 AM

 

[Thinkoflaura]

Sorry, I posted before I read your second post, LOL.
I agree with you and the poster at the blog site.
I wonder if the baby died, has a birth defect, is under the control of Scientology, or what?? WHY would they do this unless they have something to hide, literally?
Maybe they are trying to rush a private adoption of a newborn through if something went horribly wrong with the silent birth at home thing.
I really hope this isn't the case.

I stumbled upon a very graphic and disturbing Home Birth Blog site about 5 years ago before my last child. Some of the site was usual and reasonable, because let's face it, some women can push babies out and cook a 5 course meal and eat it an hour later.
But there were some seemingly very affluent and intelligent women who were giving birth at home and having horrible complications. Some did have fetal/ neonatal deaths due to cords around the neck, one woman didn't know to stand up and not let her baby fall into the big hot tub she was giving birth in. He developed aspiration pneumonia and almost died. Was in the hospital for weeks.

One woman who had not delivered the placenta left the baby attached for over an hour and it developed very severe anemia, went into cardiac arrest and they didn't know CPR.

Another had a placental separation and was bleeding heavily with every contraction and didn't know it was abnormal.
Let's see what else I remember: Doulas giving all kinds of herbs, letting women with ruptured membranes go on and on in labor with fevers which is very dangerous. Most only called for medical help when the couple insisted or when the labor coach/ doula thought she would be sued.

So, I am wondering if something went really wrong. It would kind of explain the shoe shopping in what should be her 10th or 11th month, the fake belly pad, the vacant stares, the wey Tom said there was no way the baby would come on the day of his movie premiere, and so forth.

I really hope this isn't the case, but it could be, based upon what I read about home births. Whew, it made me sick as a dog to read. BTW, the men were totally useless in every single blog I read. I guess they were holding " Silence Is Golden" signs.

I found a post on the url referenced in post #319 above that I couldn't copy, so I re-typed it. Even though it somewhat tracks what I said a few posts ago about her already having had the baby, this post goes on to give it even more explanation... and I think this person may have figured it out.


Maybe the baby came right when he needed to start doing publicity for the release of MI III, and he knew that publicity over the new baby would take away from publicity for the movie... and since he's been out doing major damage control because of all the crap that spewed from his mouth when he was "supposed" to be doing publicity for his last movie (War of the Worlds?), he's probably under orders to just do publicity for the movie and to keep his private life out of it. In a round-about way it makes sense to me.

 

[HeartofTexas]

Laura, I don't think that's the case. I think the baby is probably fine. Tom has been on TV way too much lately, and his mood has been terribly upbeat, to say the least. If something had been wrong with the baby, I don't think he could pull off being that upbeat. I think he's proud as a peacock that he's pulled the wool over everyone's eyes and none of the papparazzi have a picture of their newborn. And that's probably why there have been reports of a hospital being set up in the home, etc. All along he intended for the baby to be born at home, away from the press and the media. Tom orchestrated and controlled everything... and will control when news of the baby is released to the public. If you stop and think about it, it's just like his controlling personality to do that.

 

[Thinkoflaura]

Gosh, I hope you are right.
She must not be breastfeeding because she has a very small chest now.
Oh, well, I hope they are happy and their baby is HEALTHY. That's what matters !!!!
Thanks for your posts and the photos.

Laura, I don't think that's the case. I think the baby is probably fine. Tom has been on TV way too much lately, and his mood has been terribly upbeat, to say the least. If something had been wrong with the baby, I don't think he could pull off being that upbeat. I think he's proud as a peacock that he's pulled the wool over everyone's eyes and none of the papparazzi have a picture of their newborn. And that's probably why there have been reports of a hospital being set up in the home, etc. All along he intended for the baby to be born at home, away from the press and the media. Tom orchestrated and controlled everything... and will control when news of the baby is released to the public. If you stop and think about it, it's just like his controlling personality to do that.

 

[IdahoMom]

I had a cupcake tonight and it reminded me of Katie. :blushing:

 

[Tristan]

I, for one, believe that they will "have" the baby the weekend that
MI-2 opens.

In his interview with Diane Sawyer, he said they were focusing on what's important now....the baby and the MOVIE.

 

[BhamMama]

I think she's already had it. I also think that some sperm donor is rich right now or at the very least, an in vitro doc is carrying a hunk of change around for a job well done. I sorta shiver and get a little queasy at the thought it might have been conceived the normal way...icky!

As for doula's. That's the parents fault frankly. They didn't research enough. A doula is a coach not a certified midwife. Unless they dropped that baby in the water on its head or held it under, the water wouldn't have hurt it. Many, many people give birth in water without problems.

My take on this whole giving birth at home thing is, fine, do it. It is a wonderful thing, but have back ups, don't rely on anyone else to tell you when something is wrong.....and scream or moan if you want to I'm sure they had a whole team of doctors in there though, not just some measly midwife for her!

These two are just freaky! I kinda wish I'd not started reading it lol

 

[HeartofTexas]

Okay, here's my big analysis of this whole stupid TomKatKitten ordeal. Remember when Tom jumped on Oprah's couch like a Thetan gone mad? I checked the dates, and that was May 23, 2005. The funeral in Austalia was February 17, 2006.

My guess is that Tom had just found out Katie was pregnant with his love spawn the day he appeared on Oprah, which is why he went totally bonkers. If you date the pregnancy from then, and zoom thru to the pix we saw of her while in Australia where she definitely looked pregnant, then I would say the baby was probably born shortly after returning from the Australia trip... either late February or early March. That would work out pretty well from the May 23 appearance on Oprah's show, I think.

 

[tybee204]

My God...Have these people not had this baby yet? How long has she been pregnant? A year or 2?

 

[Mabel]

My God...Have these people not had this baby yet? How long has she been pregnant? A year or 2?

Aliens have a much longer gestational period than mere humans.

 

[Floh]

Cruise: I will eat placenta

He told GQ magazine: "I'm gonna eat the placenta. I thought that would be good. Very nutritious. I'm gonna eat the cord and the placenta right there."

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/showbiz/articles/22342268?source=PA

Now i'm really beginning to believe the words from Cruise are deliberately being said to wind the media up.

and, of course, to keep his name firmly in place.

i have heard some mothers do this (?) but what earthly benefit would it be for anyone else?

Cruise: I will eat placenta 2

But when it was pointed out it would be a big meal, he added: 'OK. Maybe I won't.'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/li...ews.html?in_article_id=383330&in_page_id=1773

***

From what posters have been saying, it really does make sense (if anything can make sense and if she were ever pregnant) she's had the baby already.

which is why she can go shoe shopping.

which is also why they have the pictures of the new-born ready for release when they want and why we won't see the baby in public for many months when they'll hope to be able to pass their baby as a month or so youner than as is.

only thing is, the 'official' birthdate registration will be fraudulent - but what's a little fraud to Cruise?

 

[Tristan]

Well, if they don't "have" (read: produce) this baby soon, EVERYONE is going to figure it out.

They have to announce the birth SOMETIME!!! LOL

 

[michelle]

:laugh:

Aliens have a much longer gestational period than mere humans.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Becba]

When I heard about Nicoles pregnancy I attributed it to Tom using Viagra instead of vitamins. He was said to be basically non sexual before then and with Viagra coming out I think it helped him be able to have sex with his wife. It is likely how Katey got preggers. Without it and with female partners I don't think his "member" was up to the challange.

 

[kato]

you know this is sniffing of a Micheal Jackson scenario-I mean tom and MJ are not that different imo-completely fake and N's..all the way..only thing Tom does is hide everything and call it scientology. I mean he isnt a pedophile but there is somethign equally as bizarre about him.

I was thinking the same thing.

 

[robinparten]

I never thought I would find someone to be as weird as Michael Jackson, but Tom Cruise is just about there. What a freak. He is going to eat the placenta????? I really hope his movie bombs and he moves into a life of total obscurity.

 

[lisag]

Her belly button looks like a button from a couch cushion...

I agree - it does look awfully big, doesn't it ???