Disproven by previous relationships? How so? We simply don't have enough of a history. I don't see much in the way of symbiotic relationships. I don't see anyone long term except her mother.
I have ample evidence to form an opinion that she's a psychopath. I don't rely on the media for information. Her behavior, before, during and after the slaughter of Travis is enough. Total disregard for human life, premeditation, total lack of remorse, they way she mimics others, the way she manipulates and uses everyone around her, just watching her interviews and the evidence should be sufficient.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Prefatory statements: I am not attacking your post. It's just the first one that has been posted since this has been started.
I am also not attacking Travis, but using him as an example. I do not believe what I am about to say. I am just demonstrating how easy it is to "diagnose" someone with a mental disorder based on interpretation of symptomology alone.
The criteria for Antisocial Personality Disorder via the DSM-IV-TR is as follows:
A. There is a pervasive pattern of disregard for and violation of the rights of others occurring since age 15 years, as indicated by three (or more) of the following:
(1) failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors as indicated by repeatedly performing acts that are grounds for arrest
(2) deceitfulness, as indicated by repeated lying, use of aliases, or conning others for personal profit or pleasure
(3) impulsivity or failure to plan ahead
(4) irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical fights or assaults
(5) reckless disregard for safety of self or others
(6) consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure to sustain consistent work behavior or honor financial obligations
(7) lack of remorse, as indicated by being indifferent to or rationalizing having hurt, mistreated, or stolen from another
B. The individual is at least age 18 years.
C. There is evidence of Conduct Disorder with onset before age 15 years.
D. The occurrence of antisocial behavior is not exclusively during the course ofSchizophrenia or a Manic Episode.
You have to have three or more incidents that fall in the "A" category, and the rest of the categories must fit.
Well, let's take a look at the "A" category:
(2) deceitfulness, as indicated by repeated lying, use of aliases, or conning others for personal profit or pleasure
Did the victim not repeatedly cheat on others? Did he not lie to them about it? Did he not work in a triangular-circular-pyramidal operation that involved actively signing up less-than-wise individuals under you? And didn't he do remarkably well at it? Did he also not keep things from his Mormon counterparts, and the church itself?
(3) impulsivity or failure to plan ahead
Wasn't he accepting of Arias, even when he had other girlfriends at the time? He would ask for her to come over, according to witnesses, and she would come. One might even suggest that he asked her to come over before another girl showed up. He also went on sporadic trips with individuals he didn't have any particular relation to, right?
(6) consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure to sustain consistent work behavior or honor financial obligations
Wasn't he having financial difficulty "because of Arias"?
(7) lack of remorse, as indicated by being indifferent to or rationalizing having hurt, mistreated, or stolen from another
Did he not cheat on multiple girlfriends? And then promise to be different to one of them, and then went ahead and kept on doing things behind her back? Didn't he continuously mislead those in the church he belonged to? Didn't he participate in a baptism ceremony he, by all rights, was not allowed to perform under the rules of the church? Did he show sorrow for this?
Now, that is one more criteria than the three necessary. Let's look at the rest:
B. The individual is at least age 18 years.
C. There is evidence of Conduct Disorder with onset before age 15 years.
D. The occurrence of antisocial behavior is not exclusively during the course ofSchizophrenia or a Manic Episode.
B is confirmed.
C is unconfirmed, but there is no such evidence for Jodi Arias, either. We can conveniently leave out this criteria.
D is assumed.
If you were to go by this, you can make
anyone into a socio/psychopath. There is a reason why the DSM-IV-TR has a
huge disclaimer in it saying that it's only a guideline and those with proper clinical experience and training are the only ones that can make any sort of credible assertion based on these guidelines.
It is very easy to let cognitive biases take over and come up with "diagnoses" of sociopathy. But there's a lot more to it than reading about symptoms and playing match-up with them.