To verify his claim of being in jail and why.
If anyone from the firm actually looked, they would have seen a current charge of Medicare fraud.
Wouldn't you agree that would be considered relevant info for a suit involving money? Hmmmmm.
PTF, Debt Collection attorneys have massive caseloads. As a result,they are really not that ambitious. I really don't think knowledge of SM's incarceration or why he was incarcerated would have made any difference to them anyway. IMO
I have to disagree with you on the medicard fraud charges being relevant to the Portfolio collection case. I don't believe the collection attorney would even attempt to use this to support their case. Even if they tried, I doubt a Judge would allow it because SM has not yet been convicted of Medicare fraud. IMO