trial day 32: the defense continues it's case in chief #91

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #741
I knew it
The defense is doing damage control.
 
  • #742
Guys she is just bored because they are not talking about HER!
 
  • #743
This is so ridiculous.. And SOOOOOO OFF track..
 
  • #744
HA HA Dang he's rewrote the whole story of his ethical reprimand.. Think they'll mention the fine?
 
  • #745
I'm callin bull chit on this RIGHT NOW.
 
  • #746
  • #747
  • #748
Custody battle - can you imagine this man being qualified to decide something like that?
Samuels mentioining the husband was a dentist. Ha, ha, now he has to tell that he got a bartered dental service in the case. "Professional" word used...yeah, sure.
 
  • #749
He is digging a deeper hole, imo. He sounds like he is making excuse after excuse.
 
  • #750
this case is becoming more and more a ........fill in whatever you think....i cannot put down what i think!!!
 
  • #751
Good, we must be at the end of his direct.
 
  • #752
The complaint and disciplinary action against him is really not a big deal IMO and Wilmott is doing the right thing by getting this out there on direct.

I would imagine it is true that there are an unusually large number of complaints filed related to custody evaluations (which is probably why it's hard to find custody evaluators these days).

On its face it does appear that in that one case it might tend to show bias towards the father, but I bet if we knew the underlying facts of the case there was probably plenty of evidence to support his custody evaluation for the father. Based on experience I would also bet the mother who filed the complaint was personality disordered -- that's who typically files complaints when they lose.

He should have kept everything above board, but it does not mean his custody evaluation was flawed. JMO
 
  • #753
Dr Samuels anecdote custody testimony of case from 1994 RELEVANCE!
 
  • #754
So why the hell did the BOARD of Psychology in New Jersey SANCTION HIM for what he did???

The charges are there against him. He was found in BREECH OF ETHICS by the board. He was sanctioned!

This guy is a piece of work.
 
  • #755
:eek: OMG is this nut going on about his own ethics spanking?


:laugh: Now it's in Juan's pocket too. This is getting so good.
 
  • #756
He was in a fog too. He didn't know!
 
  • #757
This has conflict of interest written ALL over it....
 
  • #758
  • #759
Unbenounced to you? You're licensed in the State, it is YOUR responsibility to KNOW what the rules were.
 
  • #760
Unbeknownst to me!! That covers a LOT of territory!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
52
Guests online
1,854
Total visitors
1,906

Forum statistics

Threads
632,157
Messages
18,622,835
Members
243,038
Latest member
anamericaninoz
Back
Top