- Joined
- Mar 4, 2010
- Messages
- 36,538
- Reaction score
- 85,869
Dr. Samuels is the worst expert witness that I've ever seen. JM will tear him from limb to limb. I hope the jury completely discredits this lame testimony.
What was the judge's ruling at the hearing this morning? Did she disallow the premeditated part of his testimony? TIA!!!
To be honest I haven't listened closely to his testimony but he has, in my belief, certainly implied he believes her account.I'm not saying his professional opinion is credible or that he didn't "pimp his soul" to support a psychopathic murderer, but I think his complaint from 20 years ago has nothing to do with it.
Besides, I have not noticed him going out of his way to help Jodi. He has only described what can happen to memory. He has not even said he believed her.
I think it goes to his credibility. If anyone on the jury thinks it tarnishes his opinion, they may think he's not on the up-and-up in anything he says. That would hurt JA and I don't give a flip what it does to damage her case, so have it, Samuels!We all have opinions - you could be right, or I could, but we don't know. It has little, if anything, to do with this case.
Thank yaI'm my own boss, so sick days aren't what they used to be. Tee hee. I never minded taking a day off when I worked for someone else. Sick days used to involve fishing and wandering around outdoors. Now it's six days a week and I have to be miserable to not go in.
But y'all are good company![]()
Wilmott removed it and isn't going to ask him about it.
IMO
She looks really tired to me. And looks like she could cry any minute. Ahhh poor Jodi.....Not. lol
OMG! That sneaky, sick murderess! Sliding things off the table while she stares ahead with that shark look... ugh!
And HI! I'm new!![]()
Dr. Samuels is the worst expert witness that I've ever seen. JM will tear him from limb to limb. I hope the jury completely discredits this lame testimony.
Did I understand this correctly? He is paid by the State to give an objective custody report in court. It does not happen. So afterwards he takes on the man as a client and gets paid by way of the barter system so that he can testify for this man in court. No one see anything wrong with this???? jmo
In all this time he hasn't really said much imo.
Its a so what?
imo
Lohan takes a plea..90 days locked rehab.. and some other slap on the wrist crap.. unbelievable! also she looks like crap. sorry for the o/t
We all have opinions - you could be right, or I could, but we don't know. It has little, if anything, to do with this case.
wow, minor4th. I'm shocked to hear you defend this guy.
Taking on a client for whom you have acted as a custody evaluator is unethical.
From the Guidelines for Child Custody Evaluations in Family Law Proceedings by the Ame. Psych Assn:
"Psychologists strive to avoid conflicts of interest and multiple relationships in conducting evaluations."
"Psychologists conducting a child custody evaluation with their current or prior psychother- apy clients and psychologists conducting psychotherapy with their current or prior child custody examinees are both examples of multiple relationships."