Another questions: Can you speculate on why someone who has no memory of killing someone would immediately begin covering for herself once she "comes to"? Can you speculate how she would know she'd done something terrible if she cannot remember doing it?
Anyone else concerned about today's juries and their experiences, given that most Americans are on a number of prescription and/or OTC meds for any and every ailment which can possibly be diagnosed?
Will most of those jurors think there is something physically, mentally, emotionally wrong with JA, for which she needed but wasn't receiving treatment?
If so, will they be reluctant to hold her accountable, given that some, if not most, of those jurors may believe that she can't possibly be evil/wicked enough to have butchered another human as she did if she were physiologically/psychologically ill?
Ergo, she's a victim of some awful, perhaps undiscovered and un-diagnosed psychosis, obviously.
For the Defense, that's a primary purpose of this phase of the trial.
Anyone else have consternation regarding the possibility that the jury will hold her less than entirely accountable for her admitted actions, especially after the Pinellas County 12 perverted justice in the Anthony case?
Anyone notice how nurmi and Wilma always dresss alike
Same colors
My daughter-in-law looks like Nurmi.
JA said her memory fails after she shot the gun. Juan will prove that the gunshot came last so JA does remember all knife wounds and is still lying on the stand to the jury.
Have y'all seen this spoof of JA testifying and the Judge taking charge?!??! BAHHAHAHHA
http://youtu.be/Hz8YR22DduI
I don't think the other participants (parents) were named. They weren't named other than by initials in the decision issued by the board of whatever it was that sanctioned him. Did he name the parents in court? If not, then no confidentiality was breached.
JMO
My daughter-in-law looks like Nurmi.
O/T FBI has joined in the investigation of a body found in Scurry County Texas. Possible remains of Haley Dunn?
OT: FCA's attorney asked judge for permission for FCA to sell her story. Didn't she declare bankruptcy and now wants to sell her story?? I don't understand...
Anyone else concerned about today's juries and their experiences, given that most Americans are on a number of prescription and/or OTC meds for any and every ailment which can possibly be diagnosed?
Will most of those jurors think there is something physically, mentally, emotionally wrong with JA, for which she needed but wasn't receiving treatment?
If so, will they be reluctant to hold her accountable, given that some, if not most, of those jurors may believe that she can't possibly be evil/wicked enough to have butchered another human as she did if she were physiologically/psychologically ill?
Ergo, she's a victim of some awful, perhaps undiscovered and un-diagnosed psychosis, obviously.
For the Defense, that's a primary purpose of this phase of the trial.
Anyone else have consternation regarding the possibility that the jury will hold her less than entirely accountable for her admitted actions, especially after the Pinellas County 12 perverted justice in the Anthony case?
OT: FCA's attorney asked judge for permission for FCA to sell her story. Didn't she declare bankruptcy and now wants to sell her story?? I don't understand...
Oh man I need them to speed this up. I've been called for jury duty. I don't wanna be stuck in a courtroom on a case when this finally wraps!