trial day 32: the defense continues it's case in chief #91

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #841
She looks really tired to me. And looks like she could cry any minute. Ahhh poor Jodi.....Not. lol

I am at work and I went and did a sneak peak at JA. She looks horrible.
Greasy hair, super thin face and really tired. She is looking more like her mother (except for the thinness).

Let her be stress and tired. I cannot stomach the Dr. today. Thanks for the great posts to keep me updated.
 
  • #842
And now, isn't this a breech of ethics, for him to discuss the PARTICULARS of this case in public? So much for professional confidentiality.

I don't think the other participants (parents) were named. They weren't named other than by initials in the decision issued by the board of whatever it was that sanctioned him. Did he name the parents in court? If not, then no confidentiality was breached.

JMO
 
  • #843
Jodi looked emotional he was talking about when she was covered in blood, remembering. She does remember, maybe a little guilt for making the mistake that Mimi had no plans to marry Travis.
She also looked pizzed when her lawyer started talking about the "Dr." and his lack of ethics. The attention was off of her and Jodi does not like attention off of her. She needs to be on death row, where she won't get any attention after awhile.
 
  • #844
  • #845
Now that hes explained this Juan can expand and tear it apart yeahhh!!

So this complaint was dismissed is that right?

Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2

According to him. I'm sure JM knows the complete story.

What is a "diplomate"?

I caught that too. He's a diplomate who speaks at fonctions, for comedy entertainment.
 
  • #846
That is one POV. Another could be that he looks to be an unabashed and glib sleaze who sold his soul for filthy lucre and defends a sadistic psychopath, so why should we believe his story? Not to mention the ultimate need to defend his reputation and hence his moneymaking machine. Or, as Juan would say, "How does it benefit him?"
I agree. It may have been "legal", or he thought it was legal, but it makes him look bad, IMO. They must be somewhat concerned that Juan will be all over it, otherwise she wouldn't have brought it up.
 
  • #847
Professionally, this baaaaddddd. Very bad. IMO. Ethics and credibility go hand in hand. I haven't watched his previous testimony, but I'm not getting good professional vibes from this man. This wasn't a "billing coding" boo boo or something. This was a major ethical judgment error on his part.

Remember, this is the BEST expert they could find to testify in Jodi's defense.

So Atty Wilmott is bringing this up this NJ ethics complaint in the "middle" of his testimony? Hoping to bury it so the jury won't remember?

Yep, still smells like a turd!
 
  • #848
Strange as it may seem, I think all this conflict of interest crap has inspired JA.

If I'm reading her correctly, she's got the hots for JM!

"Dear Diary, if loving Juan is wrong, I don't wanna be right."

Never!!!! :floorlaugh:
 
  • #849
this guy looks like what Ryan O'Neal looks like now hahhahahahaha i cant even look at him exact same mouth.
i think he bears a slight resemblance to William Shatner! JMO. LOL.
 
  • #850
Get this guy off the stand!!!! arrrrrrgggggggggg11
 
  • #851
OK! This is just sooooo unnecessary! Who cares if Jodie was in the "Valley of Darkness" during the stabbing---she has already admitted to it, so what is up with this guy and his 3rd grade drawings.
 
  • #852
I hope Juan trips Mr Memory Man with his memory from last thursday's testimony. I can see this eggspert getting a little heated if tested.
 
  • #853
Wilmott & Samuels = theatre of absurd!
 
  • #854
I don't care about why she can't remember what she did. I care about the fact that this was a premeditated murder. I could care less about whether or not she was unable to deal with it mentally afterwards.
 
  • #855
Cmon Judge. Develop a little bit of the Judge Judy no-nonsense attitude. This is a death penalty trial!
 
  • #856
That is one POV. Another could be that he looks to be an unabashed and glib sleaze who sold his soul for filthy lucre and defends a sadistic psychopath, so why should we believe his story? Not to mention the ultimate need to defend his reputation and hence his moneymaking machine. Or, as Juan would say, "How does it benefit him?"

I'm not saying his professional opinion is credible or that he didn't "pimp his soul" to support a psychopathic murderer, but I think his complaint from 20 years ago has nothing to do with it.

Besides, I have not noticed him going out of his way to help Jodi. He has only described what can happen to memory. He has not even said he believed her.
 
  • #857
Jodi is having a heck of a time sitting still. scratching her head, rubbing her face and neck, fiddling with her glasses.
 
  • #858
Juan seems animated at the sidebar
 
  • #859
AZ camera guy/gal not panning the room...Would be nice occasionally.
 
  • #860
Admitted to bartering for dental services. Makes me wonder what else this guy bartered HIS services for...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
147
Guests online
2,689
Total visitors
2,836

Forum statistics

Threads
632,121
Messages
18,622,406
Members
243,027
Latest member
Richard Morris
Back
Top