trial day 33: the defense continues its case in chief #95

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #521
Jeez!! I've gone thru a whole box of 20 sugar free popsicles with Willmott and her carp today...I NOW have to chew ice!!!

I'll see your popsicles and raise ya two Reubens! :floorlaugh:
 
  • #522
I can't help but think after watching all this .... that JM would be an excellant father .... fair and moral instilling!!!!! blowkiss::blowkiss:
 
  • #523
This is a beautiful thing to watch.......
 
  • #524
So that question about the amendment was withdrawn.

hmmm
fran
 
  • #525
This is my question too. Is this part of the smoke and mirrors? What do our valued attorneys say?
Does what part happen often in court? Side bars? Witness fumbling? Objections? I missed the first part.
 
  • #526
He's so disorganized... :banghead:

I do not understand why this witness does not date any of his notes, interviews, dates of testing, etc. If he's testified in court previously, he must know that details like dates are extremely important. :banghead:
 
  • #527
At this point the DT must be doing this so she may get a appeal on lack of counsel or whatever the term is. JMO
 
  • #528

Yay! I got it now! Thanks! I guess I just FEEL like this trial is somethingnoutnof the X Files:blushing:
 
  • #529
I was hoping for rebuttal to start Monday, but it's looking unlikely to me.

Defense still has a witness that can't start till Monday.
 
  • #530
I just tuned in to find... "flip... flip... flip...**brief answer** SIDEBAAAAAAAAARRRRRRR!" Rinse and repeat.
 
  • #531
I was hoping for rebuttal to start Monday, but it's looking unlikely to me.
I predict with questions LaViolette will take a full week (of court that is):twocents:
 
  • #532
What question was withdrawn?

Sent from my SGH-T679 using Tapatalk 2
 
  • #533
  • #534
So the lady in the blue & black behind the next defense is the next witness right?
 
  • #535
  • #536
I can't help but think after watching all this .... that JM would be an excellant father .... fair and moral instilling!!!!! blowkiss::blowkiss:

and affectionate and sweet. Fatherly in every way....:blushing:
 
  • #537
I'll see your popsicles and raise ya two Reubens! :floorlaugh:

I'll raise you a whole big ole family size jumbo bag of peanut M & M's - and a broken foot so no exercise!
 
  • #538
Uh Oh, they held back providing the state the amendment!

:what:
fran

Isn't that the reason they interviewed Samuel's last Thursday? This is utter non-sense. This "doctor" didn't even re-do the test after JA changed her story. He has got to be one of the most unethical, disorganized, combative "experts" I have seen. :moo:
 
  • #539
Bloody hell of course she objects!!!!
 
  • #540
Wilmott and Nurmi should have a pow-wow with their client and let her know she needs to plead for LWOP.

They tried that JUAN said NO WAY
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
82
Guests online
2,290
Total visitors
2,372

Forum statistics

Threads
633,074
Messages
18,635,864
Members
243,397
Latest member
Gaz00
Back
Top