trial day 41: the defense continues its case in chief #120

[DairyGirl]

"She's still attached to him?" All righty.. Who's problem is that? I have had relationships that end where I still feel attached. I leave them alone and work through my own issues. I don't drive to another state and butcher them. And I've ended relationships when the other person is still attached. Do I feel bad about that? Of course I do but I realize that it isn't my problem and let them work through it themselves. The expert really is showing her ignorance. There is no reason for JA to be attached (read obsessed) as far as financially or legally or with a common child. She is "attached" as the expert says, through her own sick obsessions.

 

[corundogs]

Can JM ask ALV the question "If someone is an abuser, do they abuse everyone they are in a relationship of anykind with?"

If her answer is yes...then why no other reports?

If her answer is no...then is it the person they are abusing at fault since they cause the abuser to act differently than they EVER have?????

 

[Horace Finklestein]

OH TA's ability to win her back. She's not responsible for her feelings.

 

[ButForFortune]

I like how Wilmott says "and I will ask you a more specific question." No Wilmott, just say what you REALLY mean - "I will ask you a more leading question so you get the answer right".

The jury is not stupid.

And the Jodi Arias show continues.

 

[katydid23]

JW:" Did she do what she often does, and try to take him down a notch?'

ALV: " yes, she does."

So when Jodi is abusive, they describe it as ' taking him down a notch?'

 

[MaryAnn]

I think if the jurors had been sequestered they would have all jumped ship. I can't imagine listening to this and then not being able to go home to a normal place and just hug your Dog to get all this BS out of your head.

The defense has repeated the same stories a zillion times.

Please let JM cross I can't take anymore. lease:

 

[DairyGirl]

Is it me but I haven't seen any indication that Travis was in any way trying to win JA back? It seems more that he was trying to get rid of her.

 

[vikinggrl]

The gist!! Instead, get her to say that the gist of it is that everything Travis did and said was abusive and aggressive and everything JA did was consistent with the behaviour of a victim of abuse. Done! Cross please!

 

[Bravo]

Whoever said from the start that this woman is worse than Samuels? You were SO right!

I agree as well. I never thought it possible. At least some of Samuels blunders provided some chuckles. This is dry and boring. Not to mention a twisted version.

 

[ButForFortune]

I just realized - all the weird anecdotes that LaViolette has bored us with for days on end has completely stopped!

 

[megmono]

May she continue judge.


Gag me

 

[NotMyselfNEMore]

She's quoting the text message verbatim.

 

[Charterhouse]

I think there should be a mistrial. This judge is incompetent.

 

[beldon]

I'm not much for fighting myself, but...is it a bad thing that there are 3 women I wish i could poke in the nose right now?

 

[kaki]

"She's still attached to him?" All righty.. Who's problem is that? I have had relationships that end where I still feel attached. I leave them alone and work through my own issues. I don't drive to another state and butcher them. And I've ended relationships when the other person is still attached. Do I feel bad about that? Of course I do but I realize that it isn't my problem and let them work through it themselves. The expert really is showing her ignorance. There is no reason for JA to be attached (read obsessed) as far as financially or legally or with a common child. She is "attached" as the expert says, through her own sick obsessions.

What day are we up to now? I cant bear to watch. How many potty breaks has she taken?

 

[ButForFortune]

Wilmott in quite a snit today. Even sarcastic to the judge.

 

[megmono]

How is this not leading

 

[3trees]

Go Juan!!! The defense between JA and JW is that JW will giggle and smile while she tears you to shreds.

 

[Angelina Frost]

 

[dog.gone.cute]

:twocents:

Does Willmott ever look at jury to "gauge" their reaction to this utter non-sense ?

She needs to ... she has got to see that these jurors are no doubt BORED out of their minds listening to this bull ...

But I don't think Willmott cares that she is "losing" the jury with this non-sense ... because more and more each day, it seems to be about "her" [Willmott] ...

She is getting more and more like her client !

:moo: