Vhead, have you seen his questioning of all the witnesses, both prosecution and defense? There is a definite pattern. When the witness is forthcoming and answers the questions he asks, he is respectful and almost mild-mannered, or at the very least very mannerly. If they are evasive (Jodi, Samuels, LaViolette) he raises his voice, he cuts them off when they begin to meander and run away from his questions. He gets in their face until they do answer his questions, and his job is to get those answers any way possible. It is very clear what's going on, and the jury sees it as well. Judging from THEIR questions of at least Jodi and Samuels, they mocked those witnesses themselves!
I am very surprized that you would feel any sympathy for her at all, frankly. She is being paid THOUSANDS of dollars to testify, her approach to assess Jodi vis-a-vis domestic violence is nakedly biased, much of her testimony has HURT real victims of domestic violence, and she appears to be a complete fool regarding the validity of her source, namely Jodi. Not to mention the long-winded, heinous character assassination of the person who the defendant SLAUGHTERED and in front of his family, who then has the audacity to elbow her way to the victim's sister and get in her face. I can't see how anyone could feel sorry for her over some loud, blunt and direct questions from the guy she KNEW would be questioning her.
