Is there any possibility whatoever of JA being acquitted??
This is the part that gets to me. LaViolette doesn't seem remotely self-reflective.
Only if Juan cross-examines her after she explains it...
:floorlaugh:
Killer's own brother said as much on his FB page.
But she is a sociopath and a charming pathological liar. So he might have had bouts of fear at some points but she could talk him out of it if she tried.
I think she was convincing him she had a new love interest in Utah, and she was moving on and was over him. So he might have let his guard down. Sadly enough.
NONE ever admitted into evidence!
nurse
It's a big bombshell right?
I think this chick seriously thinks she will be acquitted, she's having visions of grandeur, book signing, tv Appearances ...and like she said! She will be popular. In her deranged mind she's already making out her itinerary.
I seriously wonder how she's going to handle the verdict if its what we all are praying for.
I love how the HLN TH's like to belittle Juan, and say he makes mountains out of molehills,
and fights over meaningless details, like the keynote speaker/CV issue. But I strongly disagree.
ALV submitted that document to the court for THIS CASE. And it was a bit of a misrepresentation. She stretched the truth a bit. I have done the same on job resumes. But NOT anything that would have been submitted to a Capital Murder case.
He was diligent, imo, to point out her pattern of spinning the truth to suit her. JMO
I have never understood why some are so determined that they didn't have sex that day. It requires a great deal more mental gymnastics to believe they didn't than it does to believe they did.
I have never understood why some are so determined that they didn't have sex that day. It requires a great deal more mental gymnastics to believe they didn't than it does to believe they did.
There's the Son Of Sam law passed back in the 70's in NY. It blocks a convicted person from telling or selling their story for profit. I'm not sure if AZ has such a law?
Proves nothing. She could have had sex with anything or anyone prior to arriving at Travis' house to murder him.
who wants to do this again: raise your hand
not me.
I have heard quite enough of arias.. and she can just sit still for the rest. I don't think I ever would rejoice her returning to the stand for any reason. I have no reason to listen to her. She is a proven liar. I do not believe a word she says. I hope this latest expert also figures this out. If she were as intelligent as the six or seven experts that refused to take this case we would not be here now.. oh guess I should correct that: we would be here with whomever the defense could pay to testify their premise.
Guess what.
When you open doors to all the other contacts and texts that travis had with friends you open the door to STALKING. you open the door to his FEAR (we have also heard this on hln interviews). Open the door and Juan is going to walk thru it and thank GOD for that. how could ne not walk thru that door? As Juan and Flores have constantly and consistently stated THEY ARE THE VOICE FOR TRAVIS.
so all this crap with arias sneaking looks over her shoulder at the gallery and the trying to smile at the entire jury panel: come on give it up: just let them do their jobs and maybe someday soon we can all voice just exactly what we feel about what you did to Travis Alexander.
A small point <maybe> about AVL padding her CV as a"keynote speaker" Does that NOT jack up your rate at speaking engagements?
She was extra-creepy today (Imo)!!!!!
I cant put my finger on it--but there was something different....
I have never understood why some are so determined that they didn't have sex that day. It requires a great deal more mental gymnastics to believe they didn't than it does to believe they did.
Is there some significance to this and the murder? TIA