trial day 42: the defense continues its case in chief #128

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,101
I've read the new DT motions and have to ask. Do they have a stack of these in Nurmis brief case they can insert a date onto and submit at whim? Because that's what it looks like.
Other than the fact that JM is methodically making their prime witness look like a bumbling fool, what happened yesterday to prompt this motion?
 
  • #1,102
In all the fairy talin' and manifestoin' I've missed this... is court to start at 12:30 on the east coast? :)

Yes, but when they say 9:30, I usually add about 45 minutes. :)
 
  • #1,103
Manifesto??

That's NEVER good -- Unabomber, Mass murderer Anders Breivik, Communist manifesto, Virginia Tech mass murderer Cho, terrorist/killer Eric Rudolph.

I can't think of a "manifesto" in modern history that has ever had a positive connotation associated with it. Can't wait to see what this is all about.
 
  • #1,104
One of her CA coworkers said on tv that Jodi got so mad when she couldn't get someone to change shifts to accommodate her that she went in a restroom, screamed, and kicked a hole in the wall.

No Ma'M, you have it all wrong.

The wall abused her and attacked her. It was part of the Continuum amd there was a great power differential between the wall and her.

Jodi just defended herself when the wall attacked her. $300 please.
 
  • #1,105
I've a question. These females that the defense claimed TA was talking too,Are they real people or was it JA making up names and trying to con TA into saying sexual things ,she could add to her list of things to use against him. oh did JM ever talk to any of them?TA must have had lots of different people on his friends list. its shocking if these names are real ,how people use their real names to chat with people they don't know. so easy to find out where one lives if one puts their real name while talking to strangers.


Hmmmm. You have given me an idea. What if Jodi was faking each of these ladies' ID and chatting to Travis.......AND what if Juanyummy has proof that it was actually Jodi? Like maybe her ip address. I noticed how he was specific about stating the whole name of each lady. Thoughts?
 
  • #1,106
Isn't a manifesto usually done for a mass murder? :waitasec:

Manifesto??

That's NEVER good -- Unabomber, Mass murderer Anders Breivik, Communist manifesto, Virginia Tech mass murderer Cho, terrorist/killer Eric Rudolph.

I can't think of a "manifesto" in modern history that has ever had a positive connotation associated with it. Can't wait to see what this is all about.

I think Mein Kampf could be considered a manifesto as well.
 
  • #1,107
No Ma'M, you have it all wrong.

The wall abused her and attacked her. It was part of the Continuum amd there was a great power differential between the wall and her.

Jodi just defended herself when the wall attacked her. $300 please.

Lolololololol.
 
  • #1,108
I've a question. These females that the defense claimed TA was talking too,Are they real people or was it JA making up names and trying to con TA into saying sexual things ,she could add to her list of things to use against him. oh did JM ever talk to any of them?TA must have had lots of different people on his friends list. its shocking if these names are real ,how people use their real names to chat with people they don't know. so easy to find out where one lives if one puts their real name while talking to strangers.

I suspect they are real and we may see a couple on rebuttal. For example, he could bring one of them up and just ask a handful of questions like those below. I suspect all the rebuttal witnesses other than Demarte will just get a few questions.

"Did you know the victim in this case, Travis Alexander?"
"Did you and he have some sort of exchange in Xxxx, 200x?"
"Can you put this exchange in context? Was it in jest, serious, what?"
"So if the defense had a so-called expert, who never interviewed you to try to determine that context, characterize it as indicative of you being vulnerable to an abusive Travis, would that be totally inaccurate?"
"Did you ever feel victimized by him or vulnerable to him in any manner?"
"And did you know of the defendant, Jodi Arias?"
"Was it your understanding, whether it was actually the case or not, that she might be monitoring your exchanges with Mr Alexander?"
 
  • #1,109
Well Nurmi's website says his specialty is clients charged with sex crimes. I think he will do Ok after this.

Hmmmm, having just got over a TO I think I will pass on any comment, you may be correct shane......I'll leave it at that. :truce:
 
  • #1,110
I was watching Nancy Grace one night and she talked to one inmate and the inmate stated that JA had (not word for word) basically chopped up the person she killed and spread his parts throughout the desert. :what:

:eek:
 
  • #1,111
originally posted by minor4th~"...Both Alyce and Juan seem tired, and bored and distracted. In fact, even the judge and Wilmott seem disengaged "

it seemed to me that Juan sounded sick, like he had a slight upper respiratory illness
 
  • #1,112
Dear Jodi,
I got up a little late this morning. Slept in. Cause I could.
I'm on my second cup of fresh brewed coffee, sitting in my cozy flannel sleepy pants. Cause I can.
My kitty is sitting here next to me and I love the way her fur feels against my hand when I pet her, which I do, whenever I get the urge, and it's often. Cause I can.
I'm soon gonna take my dear little Puggles for walk in the morning sun. Cause I can.
Not sure what I want to make for lunch or dinner, because the choices are so varied and I never know what I'm going to really feel like eating. I eat lots of different foods. Cause I can.
I will hug and squeeze those whom I love today. Cause I can.
I will sleep well tonight, knowing that I am loved. Cause I can.
Sincerely. And I mean that.
Me
 
  • #1,113
Please, two people with the sexual history of these two do not get nekkid and not have sex. You have a better chance of convincing me the Pope isn't catholic. They sexed it up, down, inside out and and all round.

moo
If you think about it, the only "sexual history" we know about is the one's she has told us about.

moo
 
  • #1,114
I'll end by saying and restating this: I didn't like ALV right out of the gate. I didn't like her attitude and honesty?...I was offended that she was defending a person who doesn't deserve any validation but.......I do have a modicum of pity for ALV now. I really think she was hoodwinked and I am hoping by the time Juan is through with her, she will openly and professionally admit, she might've gotten this (assessment) wrong

she wasn't hoodwinked. she's testified before. she agreed to support the defense theory as an expert. apparently a lot of other DV experts refused but not alyce. she agreed. i think she has participated in CRAFTING this DV 'excuse' too. i believe she very actively took part in it.

she's doing what she's being PAID to do. she will go down fighting for this 'theory', too, regardless of how ridiculous JM makes it sound. she will never agree with him but she'll leave the stand looking like what she is---another paid hack trying to excuse and defend the indefensible.
 
  • #1,115
In case no one posted this already. Nurmi must have been watching this recently.

[video=youtube;k3jt5ibfRzw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3jt5ibfRzw[/video]
 
  • #1,116
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/manifesto

Definition of MANIFESTO
: a written statement declaring publicly the intentions, motives, or views of its issuer
See manifesto defined for English-language learners »
See manifesto defined for kids »
Examples of MANIFESTO

The group's manifesto focused on helping the poor and stopping violence.

Origin of MANIFESTO
Italian, denunciation, manifest, from manifestare to manifest, from Latin, from manifestus
First Known Use: 1620
 
  • #1,117
I've read the new DT motions and have to ask. Do they have a stack of these in Nurmis brief case they can insert a date onto and submit at whim? Because that's what it looks like.
Other than the fact that JM is methodically making their prime witness look like a bumbling fool, what happened yesterday to prompt this motion?

That actually was filed on Sunday afternoon I believe.
 
  • #1,118
Good point. The Salem trials reference sounds like something a media observer would come up with, not a lawyer.

I'm getting a bit of humor out of the fact that his motion is basically calling her a witch. :giggle:
 
  • #1,119
Unfortunately, the closer we get to the rebuttal stage, more motions for mistrial will be made. The DF team is nervous as to what JM will present during this stage. I am sure there are a few wowzers. Wilmont makes it clear with her facial expressions, her objections throwing all reasons in them... time, relevance, hearsay, speculation, foundation. She just wants one to fit... JA, Nurmi and MS staring into the jurors box. The delays are ridiculous but they just don't want to go there. Just my observations and JMO.
 
  • #1,120
she wasn't hoodwinked. she's testified before. she agreed to support the defense theory as an expert. apparently a lot of other DV experts refused but not alyce. she agreed. i think she has participated in CRAFTING this DV 'excuse' too. i believe she very actively took part in it.

she's doing what she's being PAID to do. she will go down fighting for this 'theory', too, regardless of how ridiculous JM makes it sound. she will never agree with him but she'll leave the stand looking like what she is---another paid hack trying to excuse and defend the indefensible.

I think that if TA had killed JA ALV would be testifying for the prosecution. JMO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
73
Guests online
2,460
Total visitors
2,533

Forum statistics

Threads
632,099
Messages
18,621,979
Members
243,019
Latest member
22kimba22
Back
Top