LaViolette isn't aware of any 'untruthfullness' on the part of the defendant that precedes the killing, because she neither looked for it in the journals, or sought to discover it by interviewing any relatives, friends or co-workers about claims the defendant had made both verbally and in her journals.
Now she'll have to double down on calling Arias's father an abuser - but the Jury will have seen nice, mild mannered, concerned, anxious Mr Arias expressing concern about his daughter's honesty, not the man who one 'shoved' his daughter and rendered her miraculously unconscious.