trial day 45: the defense continues its case in chief #136

[katiedid2]

No worries my fella sleuthers...the jury is on to this woman's complete bias, nonsense and flawed reasoning.
When ALV talked about Travis "ordering" Jodi to clear out her voice-mail box (and didn't preface it with 'please') I mean.........wow! Talk about slanting something so innocent as that .....in order to bolster the person who metaphorically-speaking, signs your paycheck!!!

She's done. So for those keeping score, 2 down (Samuels and LaViolette) and 1 to go (whoever that is)

Lol gurl you made me giggle. I was worried but it looks like I'm worrying for nuttin?

 

[moonshyne]

The judge just TOLD the jury to be back in ten minutes.. but wait did she say please?? If not she must be ABUSING the jury according to ALVs logic!

 

[mobius99]

The jury has Jodi pegged for the lying murderer she is. They didn't believe Doc Samuels, and they don't appear to believe ALV.

Their work is almost done!

Justice for Travis is coming soon...

BBB
That. And they've pegged Alyce for the paid shill that she is.

 

[Arishia]

Her daughter's wedding?? HER DAUGHTER'S WEDDING???
NOBODY GIVES A RAT'S BUTT!

I know! Her boundaries are so flawed, with a pinch of narcissism.

 

[zoozoo]

Does anyone remember the date of when Samuals said they convinced JA to tell the "truth"? (Change in story from ninja to DV)

Wish I did. I am re-posting hoping someone can answer....

 

[snowcat]

I heard many questions that make me confident about the verdict. Some questions worry me and I will worry until the end of rebuttal and those questions. I have a major headache and need to go to buy some nice wine to go with my advil

 

[SunDawnn]

One of life's great mysteries, imo. She didn't talk to ANYONE else. She only 'read' things, and I'm hoping someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but in her lengthy CV there is absolutely NOTHINg in her education or CE that suggests or even hints at training in textual analysis of journals or electronic communications, nor any other form of evaluating qualitative data of that type.

ALV likes to read. A lot. Then she likes to talk about what she thinks about what she has read. That's basically it.

She didn't talk to anyone much like someone who would tries to convince others the world is flat yet doesn't walk around it to find out.

Saying words is easy. Proving it work puts you in a position of being wrong. And ALV is getting paid to be right!

 

[Observer in AZ]

IDK about the rest of you but I got tears in my eyes when I heard the question about a woman being the perp abusing the man and killing him..

I feel this jury gets it and will do the right thing for TAs family!

 

[Mintedlace]

That's my question. Is he up next. IS LAV done?

After jury questions are done JW gets another shot at ALV, then it's Juan's turn, then JW gets yet another turn.

 

[DairyGirl]

Wasn't it fortunate that, unlike the other times, JA just happened to have 2 weapons at her disposal to protect herself from Travis's abuse?

 

[rose222]

Ah okay, don't you give me a heart attack. :floorlaugh:

I was specifically talking about the pedo bs. What you wrote makes sense, I understand that. Rather than pro defense (imo), it was more...clarification. They seem to be a conscientious bunch- they'd want ALL possibilities included.

Yes. I think they want to keep an open mind till the end. That's their job. They could say 'well, even if she was abused....' stuff like that.

This jury will convict her of first degree murder. I'm surer than ever! :great:

 

[Nellie Nelson]

JA said it was her neck.

Well well well. So her neck becomes her face before they settle on her jaw.

The horrifying perpetually evolving till we're (Defence Team) all on the same page as each other tales of the assault on Ms Arias continue apace.

 

[Avalon85]

Just remember, no matter what this woman says, no matter how much one-sided testimony she spews......


if you go get another weapon after your attacker is already incapacitated, it's not self-defense.

the rest of it is filler

GREAT point!

 

[Lorelilly]

This is not going well for us TA and JM supporters imo

Huh? You watching the Trial today, Thursday, April 11, 2013 approx 6:05 pm CST? Because I am and its BAD for JA and Team Jodi. Just sayin'

 

[Schuby]

Remember she doesn't know the character limits on communication applications, or the time constraints people have to message, or the common linguistic style of text or IM messaging. She's entirely unqualified to judge the meaning behind digital messaging. Umad?

Really good point. She wouldn't know that when texting people tend to abbreviate their thoughts and use as few words possible.

 

[corundogs]

Question for y'all...

Does ALV know that Jodi testified to the fact that she made up her story to fit the evidence??????

I missed 90% of today...and I feel really lost. Weird, since I know not much happened. I think I might have a problem.

At least there should be another interesting trial coming up in June - Trayvon Martin I heard starts June 12th I think.

 

[carnnell]

In my humble opinion the jury gets it!!! Some of the questions appear to be "playing devils advocate" types. Otherwise, the jury is not buying the goods. I truly believe once they have the jury have their question answer, such as the answers are "finger down the throat", they will poo poo this expert down the toilet like they did Samuel.

Thank goodness!!!

 

[rose222]

IDK about the rest of you but I got tears in my eyes when I heard the question about a woman being the perp abusing the man and killing him..

I feel this jury gets it and will do the right thing for TAs family!

I cried when the psychological abuse was mentioned!

 

[prima.facie]

Googling the phrase only brought up 5 results and 2 related to this trial. The other 3 all went to the same website of a photo project.

I have no idea what this is supposed to mean, and doubt that the jury does either. The insinuation from ALV is that it has to do with this pedo nonsense.

Guess the juror should have asked her what it meant.

I think I know what it means - for her (since seems nobody else on this Earth says it)...but I think its against T&C to say...very very G-rated version, another way of saying "sex".

 

[ShadyLady]

I believe she is saying PORKING THE POT. ANd be careful when you google that! :blushing:

Originally she said that Travis said..."porking a 14 year old"................she is misquoting herself. Jurors won't forget that comment!!!!