It seems Alyce LaViolette was presented with the majority of the facts first only to distort them later when they didn't support her turn-of-the-century stance! The only jurors who can remotely agree with her antiquated overview on this situation are those approaching the centenarian milestone.
I personally have known more women who verbally abuse their partners than men who physically abuse them. And it's not the 'secret' factor that ALV wants us to believe. There are MANY talltale signs of abuse. First being, there has to be a 'relationship' in place and there was NOT one here!
Another key or common denominator in many domestic abuse situations are the presence of either drugs, alcohol or both. I admit I didn't listen to 90% of her diatribe on Direct so I'm not sure ALV mentioned that important demographic element. Probably not because once again, it doesn't support this case.
This not only wasn't a abusive situation it wasn't a domestic anything. There was no domain, abuse nor relationship shared!!! Ugh!
This was a couple who had been broken up a year ago by that point. I want Juan to REALLY drill that into the jurors noggin.