trial day 47: the defense continues its case in chief #142

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #961
this is ridiculous, what a waste of time......was this supposed to be a mistrial hearing or a hearing to enter this man's testimony?
 
  • #962
 
  • #963
um what is the point of this?
 
  • #964
Okay. Now I get it. He will testify as to what he thinks he sees in the image based upon hyper-magnification (and imagination), but he can't actually show that magnification in court, because it would show a "created" image. So he wants to testify to an image that he sees as the product of "creation", but doesn't want to show the 'creation", because that would be "creating." Have I got this figured out now?
 
  • #965
I hate "talking" over Juan but is all this just more DT BS, or is it really important
 
  • #966
I missed the big moment :banghead:
 
  • #967
This expert looks terrified.
 
  • #968
You know what I see in this picture? An EYE!! Imagine that.
It might be a woman wearing a scarf, or an old crone . . . No wait, it's a vase, or maybe two faces . . .
 
  • #969
"After blew out my ppi and dpi And adjusted my rectalinear whoosie what's its....this is the image I was left with..."
patterson_bigfoot.jpg
 
  • #970
If there was someone else there, why did Jodi not throw that person under the bus? She hasn't cared much who she destroys, so why take the blame for the vicious killing all alone?

I agree. And why isn't Jody giving the court their names, oh, that's right, they threaten her family. Sarcasm. moo
 
  • #971
Get him, Juan!!
 
  • #972
Love me some juan martinez
 
  • #973
UGH! I have forensic photo software that "experts" use and it is not 100% reliable even...especially when you are working with certain quality of pictures and at 72dpi if you printed that it would be SMALL...............and what he is doing is distorting the image by blowing it up. Forensics are NOT like CSI and you cant just make a blurry picture clear like they can on CSI.

*FAIL*

ETA. Im an investigative crimianl forensic major.....but have never testified in court. my opinions based on my education....
 
  • #974
so to me IMO it looks like someone is holding a camera in one hand and then the other near their face they are holding something else above the camera..

Like I said MOO...
 
  • #975
Juan looks even better in this light. I think he's had another hair cut

And a pic of JM vs the witness. I like this!
 

Attachments

  • jmlight.jpg
    jmlight.jpg
    5.6 KB · Views: 22
  • jmvswitness.jpg
    jmvswitness.jpg
    8.3 KB · Views: 9
  • #976
Where is the DT trying to go with this? Trying to prove what?

Could it imply the gun was fired prestabbing...i.e., picture taken & gun fired simultaneously?!
 
  • #977
"One more time Juan?"
 
  • #978
The Judge asked the attorneys to approach. Next thing you know Jodi is moved.

I think maybe the Judge saw how painful it was for the family and had them move her. MOO

I hope the judge, or JM, or Flores or anyone saw how very wrong it was to have the defendant sit so close to the victim's next of kin - it seems very cruel.
Given that the Jury is not present, and the defendant is moving around the courtroom quite a bit, in the darkened room - shouldn't she be shackled? For everyone's safety?
 
  • #979
  • #980
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
137
Guests online
3,124
Total visitors
3,261

Forum statistics

Threads
632,199
Messages
18,623,455
Members
243,055
Latest member
michelle cathleen
Back
Top