Wilmont's cross sounded more like interviewing a perspective employee for a job. I mean, REALLY? Probably Samuels and ALV haven't had experience with 1/4 of those tests DD rattled off. And stuff not on her CV? PULEEZE! She didn't put some lectures on it because it's secondary to her clients and she doesn't use her CV that often.........OMG. Come on, Wilmont, is THAT all you've got? Go after DD's credentials? It's not working!
And with JA busily coloring in her "Snow White" coloring book most of the day, did you all notice that when the diagnosis, "Borderline Personality Disorder" popped up, "someone" dropped her crayons and stared down DD? If looks could kill........
DD comes off very professional, observes the court rules, articulates well, gives the jury their respect, and does a good job "correcting" JW when JW looses her train of thought or doesn't have her information current. DD is showing no bias, using the proper tests, the proper test sheets and test grading protocol, and, evidently has a passion for her line of forensics.
Someone should check what JW has in her drinking cup.....she talked like she had drunk a case of Red Bull.:facepalm: