- Joined
- Jan 11, 2011
- Messages
- 7,374
- Reaction score
- 8,889
These state rebuttal witnesses are probably going to give JA lots of headaches in the coming days.
Good morning! I'm new here, finally got registered.How is everyone?
These state rebuttal witnesses are probably going to give JA lots of headaches in the coming days.
I notice when the deputy brought JA back in, he walked in front of her through the door. I find that a little surprising given all the 'stuff' he's got on his belt.
At the ~1:50 mark, JW flashes a little grin like she's really pleased with herself. Then Nurmi turns his back on the jury to talk to JW. That seems pretty disrespectful - he couldn't wait 5 seconds?
Who is the blonde the judge called up at the end? She carried a bag, so presumably she wasn't a courthouse employee.
And this is probably stated farther on but the very last thing Lenore Watkins said on NG, the very last thing, was that she saw (not a direct quote) no BWS in this case.I just caught this as well. Way to go Nancy for exposing Wilmotts incompetence. I can't believe JW was so stupid as to make such a false claim:what: Love how Nancy is critiquing JW's strategy as a yawn and a fail!
I'm pizzd that just when things finally started moving the duhfense has delayed using dirty pool tactics again. It's really getting pathetic and the judge needs to put her foot down about these supposed migrains.
Actually the Dr who supervises ALV's practice lost his license so ALV lost hers by default so she's stuck with conferences, expert testimony and re publishing her book. I'm not sure what the DT is trying to pull off but I've noticed they assume the jury is really stupid. Either that or they themselves are.Just re-watching Dr. D now. The DT seems is trying to make something of Dr. D practicing while she was UNDER/SUPERVISED by another licensed psych, but isn't that what ALV STILL does?? She never got her license so what the heck!?!
:banghead:
In regard to all the posts about Jodi sneaking pencils out of court, I started wondering what else she could want pencils for and found the following article:
"3 Inmates Swallow Pencils: Get out of Jail"
http://www.peoplesdefender.com/main.asp?SectionID=13&SubSectionID=83&ArticleID=135761
I started wondering if perhaps Jodi has a different intention for sneaking/stealing pencils other than the obvious and regular use... What other (nefarious) things can pencils be used for?
-Stabbing
-Swallowing
-put in her lips to pretend she's a vampire...lol!
-????
ALV isn't a psychologist, she doesn't have her PhD. I think she's a licensed family counsellor or something similar.??
I agree the DT making an issue out of this was stupid. Dr. Demarte was practising for 9 years, despite not having her PhD earlier. The DT are desperate, hoping one juror will find Dr. Demarte less than credible.
For the record, I find JW to be a lousy attorney. LOL
Would it surprise you that wallmart have NO record of you returning this gas can?
The look on her face was priceless.
I cant wait for the wallmart and Tesoro witnesses. I hope the DT are pooping their pants
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Watching JW cross examine this expert reminds me of Jodi when she used big words during her testimony. JW can't imitate Martinez bc she lacks the knowledge and expertise that JM has, IMO.
Good morning all :seeya:
Been a busy evening/night/morning for those in West, Texas. My thoughts and prayers are with those missing, injured, and passed. Such a terrible past couple of days.
That explosion was something fierce!![]()
Ack. I am up late, 3rd time posting in 2 days, while trying to ween off obsessing over this case. As Ive mentioned, I've only got this involved on WS with Kyron Hormans case, and I was active there. I cant stop watching this case, and am waiting for it to be over in due process, and pray for justice to prevail for Travis. I piped up for the first time after lurking for months yesterday.
Frustrated about the abrupt halt today, I went on croakerqueen123s youtube. Somehow ended up on Day 25, Part 3.
Jodi Arias Trial - Day 25 - Part 3 - YouTube
Juan had established she left the camera by the bathtub (0:03:22), and then he asks if she was carrying the camera when she ran down the hallway, and her response is not the first time I ran down the hallway (0:04:26). At 0:11:01 we see Exhibit 163, a photo in the hallway.
Have I missed more blatant examination about the discrepancies here? I dont recall Juan literally pointing out, Hey, you just said you dropped the camera and it stayed there after he lunged at you, but this is a HALLWAY and Travis is obviously fatally bleeding, in direct words, just dots to connect. Is that yet to come?
In the main picture used to show Jodi dragging Travis, I'd always thought the spot on the upper right was a pool of blood, didnt see Travis' foot. But, I see it now. That perspective to me says that camera was on her, swinging from her on a strap, the entire time :/ Will this be point blank pointed out the the jurors, or just left to their note taking? Or do I need to rewatch more trial time? I have to listen on my earphones on my phone at work...
Again, up too late. Frustrated.