They testified to a WOMAN screaming, not Reeva
to fire the bullet.. to discharge it. the trigger has to be pulled. the bullet itself is in inertia until the trigger is pulled. this is simple physics.. to claim it was accidental is the concept of a person who thinks the sun will suspend itself in the sky . Oscar wants us to believe that even the laws of gravity suspended for him. That's astonishing stuff.
Oscar says, he never pulled the trigger. so we have to believe in a gun that, all by itself defies the laws of physics that every other matter, thing or human on earth is subject to .
the great miracle gun of tashas restaurant.
Guess Nel isn't gonna go into the.
Why would Reeva slam the toilet door? OP has now added this noise which was just a noise before, not a slam. Slamming a door nearly always indicates someone's upset about something - unless there was some strong through breeze that slammed it shut without Reeva's intervention.
He said will go over what he was doing while Reeva cooked dinner again, after he briefly answered.
I could be wrong but then why did he ask to look at the gun in the restaurant? Claims he was thinking of buying one, so if he had used the gun previously on a firing range, he would have no reason whats so ever to look at it in a crowded restaurant imo.He knows exactly how it handles, the video of him using that exact same gun on a shooting range is out in the public forum for all to see.
I wonder if it has been tested if the toilet door can slam. Opening out as it does it might not be possible.
Understandably so. If he was so fearful, believing it to be an intruder, he shot in auto pilot mode. I understand what Oscar's saying. I think Nel does too.
But Nel's focusing on the state of the relationship. A relationship involves TWO people to make up the whole scenario.
If the girl in a relationship says "I love him" you can't assume it's a loving relationship. The partner may then say "I don't love them".
She did say "I'm the girl who fell in love with you". My guess is that she wanted him to say it first.
I don't get howis relevant?
I don't get howis relevant?
Yep, I'm not suggesting the gun went off on it's own.
I don't know the position of the gun when it was handed over, it was apparently under the table, and nobody's yet taken responsibility for how it was handled.
There are correct methods to follow when handling, passing and receiving a firearm.
It requires that all persons involved are following this procedure. The first rule broke was that the firearm was transferred under a table.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.