...
I really can not see why people do not grasp what the sequence of events was in this case.
While the state has conceded that the shots may have come first their case does not depend on one order vs the other. I certainly understand why people have different opinion and doubts about the order of the 2 sets of sounds.
Anyway, cricket bat first or bullets, he PULLED the trigger 4 times, with marked accuracy, throught that door knowing he could or intending to mortally wound whoever was behind it.
Reeva's hands were in a defensive position
BEFOREshe was shot in the head. Now for those that accept the defense contention that the shot to the head came first
WHY would REEVA have her hands raised to her head in defense if they weren't arguing, if she wasn't scared he was about to bash in the bathroom door, if she wasn't petrified by Oscar telling her he had a gun...
Otherwise you have to accept that the first shot
hit her HIP & she screamed in bloody terror. Again,
WHY would her hands then go to her head in defense and not to her shattered hip???? (even entertaining that they moved from her hip to her head in those seconds)
BECAUSE, she was under attack and she knew instinctively to expect MORE bullets.
The defensive position of her hands is
IMMUTABLE direct evidence.
If the head shot came first and you accept Oscar's "version" Reeva's
there would have been no wound through the web of her fingers/hand. And no, Oscar she wasn't washing her face at the time. Also, if she weren't afraid of oscar wouldn't she scream "Oscar...Help," after being shot in the hip or "Oscar, CALL THE POLICE!"
I believe it was premiditated, as we all know premeditation may be formed in 2 seconds. The hands to the head
PROVE, imo, she was afraid of what was coming.
Oscar can't tiptoe stealthily on his stumps, in his version she would have heard him approaching and he would have heard her moving in the bathroom . Assuming she was accustomed to the patter or lumbering gait of his stumps, she knew it was him approaching. UNLESS they were in a fight, why wouldn't she say something, like
"occupied""I'll just be a minute"or "decide to brush your teeth".
He should have suspected it was her from the sound of water running or a flushed the toilet ( which
MUST have happened forOP's version to be true). Bladder empty, no urine in bowl...unless she wasn't there to urinate, hence the door locked
with a key from inside.
Wonder if a housekeeper could testify as to where that key was usually kept.
4 am e.s.t , please forgive typos, grammar & spelling ;-)