Well......I think it safe to say Dixon has done nothing to enhance the credibility of the defence's version of events. It has made me think though.
Firstly I thought when asked by Masipa the other day Nel said the door in court was a Replica?
Can anyone confirm this. I also cannot understand how if it is the actual door why cleaners would be allowed to touch it at all?
Surely it should be treated as evidence until the Court case and any subsequent appeals have been exhausted?
Hoping Minor 4th or one of the attorney's can explain this please.
The door is the actual door, the construction around it to act as the toilet is a replica to size of the toilet. They said something about the frame of the door as well which isn't the original either... obviously!