are we back??? yes indeedy, Nel a bit late, got his clock to blame.
now. you examined P .. did you follow the trial at all? did you follow his evidence..??
Vos. not every moment. not a great deal of it, no.
Nel. do you think the situation he finds himself would increase his anxiety? put it this way, I am not doing too well, my case is not going well. wouldn't I be anxious??
Vos.. I did hear that, that he said he was fighting for his life. he didn't say that to me in my two interviews,.. 2 d May and another date in May.. those dates of interview are my days with Mr P. I interviewd other people after those dates.
Nel. your first involvement, 2nd may??
vos.. correct. the rest of the people mrs Binge. 2nd may. I refer to my file if I may. ( paper shuffling ) . ( heavy breathing ) .. 5th May.. all of the others.. sister , manager, brother, coach, friend. 7th may, Mr P again.
Nel. ok. ok. Dr.. what is the purpose of your appearance to this court? ?
Vos. to bring psychiatric factors which may be relevant to the court, for the purpose of conviction or
Nel. these factors you feel may have been a matter of his capacity to act rightly and wrongly??
Vos. yes.
Nel. the fact that you made a finding of general anxiety disorder, you say this is relevant to the fact of the matter??
Vos. it MAY be relevant. I am not privy to that. it MAY be relevant..
Nel. you also said, he is suffering from a general anxiety and it has worsened..??
Vos, yes, it is increasing in intensity. ( she said for sentencing purposes. not conviction, my mistake) ..
Nel. that would make him a dangerous person, wouldn't it?? / his increasing intensity?
Vos. yes.
Nel. and if he has access to a gun that would make him more dangerous??
Vos, yes.
Nel. referring to PTSD.. people who suffer from this ,they say they are affected in their perception of right and wrong.. nel is a general anxiety disorder??
Vos, yes, they fall under that category. generalised, .
Nel. and these people are usually held under observation??
Vos. well. it does the court no harm to have a second opinion in this..
ooo my feed has GORN!.. its back.
Nel. well the court doesn't have the option. if his defence is his mental impairment, the court is obliged to hold him under observation ..
Vos... no. its Roux, he is arguing this. arguing forcefully now. is a person UNABLE to make the right decision due to mental impairment?? . judge is paying acute attention.
Roux.. an act of commission or omission. done under mental defect.. not criminally responsible. if it appears to the court, the court could find they are not capable .. there is two prongs here, mental illness, mental defect, making incapable of distinguishing....
Nel. I haven't made the statement as to this as yet..
Nel. having dealt with 77 78 and 79 for many years.. its not just incapable, its the diminishment of capacity. to not be so responsible, the court is bound to take this under advisement. I will oh god, my phone, milady I will never forgive myself, I am so sorry. I am embarrassment. Judge. don't let it happen again.