Trial Discussion Thread #45 - 14.07.3, Day 36

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #541
D: He fired at the sound and I'm sure it was to nullify any danger.

Nel wants break and asks for postponement to consult a psychiatrist (for the case. Don't think D has got to him that bad)

Nullify any danger! Sounds like just in case there was a danger as opposed to an actual danger.
 
  • #542
  • #543
N: Dr Carla/Karla P??? (sounded Italian).
 
  • #544
  • #545
D: He fired at the sound and I'm sure it was to nullify any danger.

Exactly. OP fired at the screaming Reeva to nullify her ability to destroy his brand forever.
 
  • #546
Nel wants to make an application. He has an appointment with a psychiatrist who was on the panel. Nel needs hours of consultation. Wants to reconvene on Monday.
Oldwage wants to know who this witness is.
Nel said the Court appointed psychiatrist for the State.
Cross-examination will continue with Prof. Derman.
 
  • #547
Sounding like a wounded lamb, Prof D agrees to 'make myself available Monday'.

But court is still in session tomorrow. Just not with this witness.

ETA: Or is it? What did judge just say?
 
  • #548
  • #549
Sounding like a wounded lamb, Prof D agrees to 'make myself available Monday'.

But court is still in session tomorrow. Just not with this witness.

ETA: Or is it? What did judge just say?

Lost my feed.
 
  • #550
Sounding like a wounded lamb, Prof D agrees to 'make myself available Monday'.

But court is still in session tomorrow. Just not with this witness.

ETA: Or is it? What did judge just say?

they won't sit means "Keine Sitzung morgen" as I understood
 
  • #551
Sounding like a wounded lamb, Prof D agrees to 'make myself available Monday'.

But court is still in session tomorrow. Just not with this witness.

ETA: Or is it? What did judge just say?

No I think is is adjourned until Monday.
 
  • #552
  • #553
is it dr carla kotze ?

I don't think so. Sounded more like Petachelli to me.

ETA: Can't believe I posted this. Not going to delete though.
 
  • #554
Dr C Kotze (e acute, can't find it!) is what it says on the Psychiatric Report
 
  • #555
Alioop - help! Is Nel likely putting the psychiatrist on to rebut this witness only or will it include other issues? And can the state psych be cross examined by the DT if he/she is largely there to rebut the DT "expert"?
 
  • #556
  • #557
  • #558
  • #559
Alioop - help! Is Nel likely putting the psychiatrist on to rebut this witness only or will it include other issues. And can the state psych be cross examined by the DT if he/she is largely there to rebut the DT "expert".

SA procedure bamboozles me so I am not the one to ask. But my guess is yes to all your questions. But someone correct me if I am wrong.
 
  • #560
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
136
Guests online
1,296
Total visitors
1,432

Forum statistics

Threads
632,356
Messages
18,625,248
Members
243,108
Latest member
enigmapoodle
Back
Top