If Darren has a motive to lie to be on the same page as the prosecution, then I wonder what kinda hanky panky deal the State must have signed with ST as her testimony on the key issue is compatible with his that OP did fire a shot without a warning through the sun-roof of his car in anger even though their testimonies differ on minor details that have NO bearing whatsoever on this murder trial. For you to compare Darrens plea bargain with those of convicted criminals doing time in prison reflects your mindset that compels you come out with all guns blazing to ridicule the truthful testimony all the witnesses who have testified so far, but you bend over backwards to sugar-coat the long list of criminal wrong doings of OP.A man who intentionally fire a gun in public can never be called a thrill seeker under any circumstances. God forbid if someone dear to you were to be at the receiving end of OPs thrill seeking misadventures, how would you react, forgive him or just issue him a shooting ticket?
Yes Sir!
Any sane individual will never mistake the sounds from his washing machine for an intruder, however as part of your strategy to strengthen your arguments in his favor you posted his tweet in this thread.