Could you specify which people you are referring to re la la land?
thanks..
Oscar and the two friends who were helping him when the doc and security showed up.
Could you specify which people you are referring to re la la land?
thanks..
Look Call it anything you want. The doc knew she was dead and had been dead for a while, IMO.
But, consider this. We know rigor will show up first in small muscles of the face. This article is saying that the muscles are already depleted of oxygen, energy, and ATP at time of death when there is a violent death so you will see early effects of rigor.
Was this a violent death? Was there fighting beforehand? Physical running, chasing, heart beating in fear?
Does 1 and 1 make 3? Or 2?
What's strange about a tourniquet for a severed arm? And you don't know if she was bleeding or not, frankly.
Sent from my GT-N5110 using Tapatalk
So how do you deal with the official fact that OP had to have pulled the trigger when the gun went off in the restaurant? Do you believe that he didn't have his finger on the trigger and that the gun miraculously discharged itself?That's what was stated. So I'll go with the official facts, not rumour or fantasy![]()
That's what was stated. So I'll go with the official facts, not rumour or fantasy![]()
Once you are dead, you don't bleed, except maybe passively as blood settles.
She died instantly in the toilet room.
How do you know this or just your opinion?
The ropes, bags, tape etc were for tourniquet substitutes. Nothing sinister. Saayman's testimony on post mortem wasn't broadcast, audio or visual. Reports were later:
allowed to summarise his findings.
Yep. Those garbage bags were not for a tourniquet. She wasn't bleeding [except passively] because her heart was no longer beating.
Do you think they had to have known she was dead?
Look Call it anything you want. The doc knew she was dead and had been dead for a while, IMO.
But, consider this. We know rigor will show up first in small muscles of the face. This article is saying that the muscles are already depleted of oxygen, energy, and ATP at time of death when there is a violent death so you will see early effects of rigor.
Was this a violent death? Was there fighting beforehand? Physical running, chasing, heart beating in fear?
Does 1 and 1 make 3? Or 2?
The ropes, bags, tape etc were for tourniquet substitutes. Nothing sinister. Saayman's testimony on post mortem wasn't broadcast, audio or visual. Reports were later:
allowed to summarise his findings.
So...he wanted Reeva dead so he shot her. Then he tried to make it look like he didn't want her dead by breaking the door and rescuing her.
Once rescued she was dead, so he thought he'd again make it look like he was trying to save her. But it was all a cover-up, as he wanted her dead anyway?
Have I got this right? :dunno:
I don't know much about this at all...but plastic bags are mentioned at no.25 on this list :- link
Don't get why that is so hard to understand, he shoots her in a rage and then realises what's he done and then realises the implications, so of course he is going to act like he want's to save her, what would you expect him to do?, just leave her in the toilet and hope no one notices?.
For full rigor to start--for the big muscles to be affected.
my apologies, Gryf... what I meant was, his testimony wasn't held in camera.. that is in a private setting , behind closed doors.. it was from the witness stand in front of the court and gallery . .it wasn't broadcast to the general public at the time, it was summarized very shortly after, yes..
Why not just accept the words of the doctor that did her autopsy? He said that after receiving the shot to her head Reeva died with 2-3 last breaths. The defense pathologist did not disagree.
BBM - He most certainly did. Help for himself.That is what it is starting to look like to me [ I hate to say it].
If he thinks he killed an intruder, why pry him out of the bathroom?
If he thinks he shot Reeva, why not call for help first and then pry open the bathroom door.
Maybe Reeva ran out of the house and is safe.
FIRST THING YOU DO WHEN THE THREAT IS CONTAINED--no matter what--CALL FOR HELP.
Did he ever call for help?
That is what it is starting to look like to me [ I hate to say it].
If he thinks he killed an intruder, why pry him out of the bathroom?
If he thinks he shot Reeva, why not call for help first and then pry open the bathroom door.
Maybe Reeva ran out of the house and is safe.
FIRST THING YOU DO WHEN THE THREAT IS CONTAINED--no matter what--CALL FOR HELP.
Did he ever call for help?