Chewy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2010
- Messages
- 2,566
- Reaction score
- 2,353
So if you were the lead detective on the case, your initial assumption that because she is dead and not where you expected to find her body, that she was involved in something "not kosher". Therefore you are implying that any foreigner who dies in Turkey would possibly have to be involved with something "not kosher". Which of course, is what we call "victim blaming", but I would rather not get into that discussion, that is your bias for whatever reason.
Well, you basically answered my question anyways by saying " teeny tiny clue that she may have been". Yes, it is a very small relationship between the two, and this I can agree on with you, even if you did not intend to state it as such.
No. Um seriously did you read anything I posted? :waitasec: Her story doesn't add up. And her story is very different than other people's stories.
From where she chose to stay
Her decision to travel alone.
Her decision to cut her trip short
Her decision to hook up with a stranger in another country
The fact that she has small children at home
(this might be a difficult one to comprehend if you don't have kids, but most people who have kids will evaluate the risk of something they want to do for fun, with the risk they put their kids in by doing so. Not everyone conforms to this mindset but as you pointed out so frequently, she's a church going mother who has been married for 20 years with a pretty decent past. She's certainly not the type to do this kind of thing unless something is wrong.)
Lead detective in me in this case says "FOUL PLAY" and not a random hit.