BLURRING VID OF WITNESSES?
Have not bn following any live coverage or recorded news clips of ^,
am relying on our wonderful posters here.
Seems extreeeemely unusual that a judge would allow blurring of multiple witnesses this way for this type of testimony, explaining some some interactions w def't's as a child (apparently no actual autism diagnosis ).
How many wit's so far?
I know judges have discretion to allow this in limited circumstances, to protect witness privacy/identity, e.g., for SA vic's or for children testifying.
Seems there must have bn a motion to blur that prompted that ruling. and an objection.
Can anyone enlighten me about the judge's basis for blurring?
And some witnesses' last names not being revealed? What???