Learn about criminal and disciplinary consequences of carrying location-restricted knives at school in this fact sheet.
www.tasb.org
SMITH COUNTY (KYTX) - According to the police report, the student had a small pocket knife. The knife was reported to school officials. In a statement from the school about the incident says:
www.cbs19.tv
RIP to Austin Metcalf. This young man shouldn’t have lost his life and no parents should have to bury a child.
I do not understand why AK had a knife on him. I read that Texas law allows for open carry of knives of 5.5 but that law only applies to individuals 18 years old and up and does not apply to restricted locations such as schools and schools events so regardless it was illegal for AK to have the weapon on him.
As for him sitting under the other team’s tent I was under the impression he was getting shelter from the rain but I could be wrong. When I did track and field in high school my teammates and I would often visit and sometimes even sit with other teams (often to vent and make jokes because those track meets were entirely too long). However, we fortunately had a system in place where we would leave our belongings with closest to one or more of the assistant coaches who would keep and eye on them. I am not sure what type of system these schools and systems had but it kept us from worrying about our stuff getting stolen.
Of course, there were exceptions, such teams my school was already very competitive against so we didn’t mingle as much with but since many of has had friends from middle school and such who attended the other high schools or even dated team members from competing teams and schools it didn’t seem like that big a deal to hang out with them or in their area.
Also, when it rained, particularly when it rained hard, we pretty much huddled under the closest tent or shelter we could find until the storm let up. It seemed well understood that no one wanted to get wet, especially when you are wearing a thin uniform or track suit and the weather was already cold before the storm.
Perhaps it was just a different time and culture and even though he technically not obliged to leave, as others have pointed out the bleachers and space is available to everyone so anyone, even opposing team members can sit wherever they want, AK should have just left and sought shelter elsewhere when asked. Also, instead of AM approaching him perhaps it would have been better that a coach or assistant coach or some adult have done so and where were they at the time AK was being asked to leave the tent area?
I can’t help but think how this situation involved two young men, teenagers, and teenagers can tend to be reactive, emotionally immature and impulsive. This is part of the reason why them having access to and carrying around weapons or potentially dangerous tools is such a concern in terms of safety and public health. They often react first and think secondly or even thirdly which is understandable at that age since their brains are still developing and they as people are still maturing cognitively, emotionally and mentally. This leads me to wonder if perhaps these factors could have contributed also to the conflict, like they have done many times before when it comes to physical fights between teenagers in the past. Did AK react with stubbornness, offense or pride when responding no when asked to leave the first time? Did AM react to annoyance or anger when told no by trying to physically push AK out? A lot of teens are not equipped just yet with conflict resolution maneuvers so perhaps if adult had stepped in to deescalated tension as they separated two boys and found a way to convince AK to leave or have him removed from the tent. Hindsight is 20/20 but someone in charge did see AK allude to some type of threat or weapon in his bag or AM start to physically push him they should have stepped in as both are warning signs that things could escalate and get even worse.
Additionally, I still don’t understand why AK thought he had to bring the knife out instead of pushing AM back or shouting and raising scene in front of everyone (that often can get people to stop their actions also as they get startled or don’t want to draw attention to themselves). Furthermore, even though AM shouldn’t have laid his hands on AK, this by no means justifies him getting fatally stabbed and losing his life.
Even though AK’s father said his son did not know the victim beforehand, I read too that both boys were football players on their school teams which makes me wonder if they did know or run into each other and had some previous conflict before before, during or after a game? Did their teams have any conflict with each other outside of playing the sport? Did AK have any personal vendetta against their team or school and did that play a role in the violence that was carried out? It is possible that AK’s father does not know everything about his son or what goes on among his team or team members which is why I pondered on these thoughts.
JMO/JMT