- Joined
- Feb 25, 2013
- Messages
- 44,010
- Reaction score
- 452,084
It could have been an informal arrangement that did not involve the courts. Sounds like they weren't married, so it could lend itself to a more informal arrangement.
When my sister relinquished custody to her ex-husband, she was shocked to find that she had to pay child support. (It was an abusive situation and she decided just to let him have his way. This was all done via the courts and they were divorced..TX)
I get the impression that Chrissy likely had a somewhat spotty employment history. Mainly because she was hired a temporary, yet it seems that the temporary position was more of a "test" because she was hired after only a week. A true temporary is there for a heavy workload, then they may or may not be hired after the work is finished.
She also had "tuned out" (left home) on a few occasions which may have been another issue with the father. It may have been something that the father held over her head.
We'll probably never know. However, courts don't always need to be involved.
Very well stated @Friday Fan.
And we have no reason to doubt that Chrissy did not understand the law pertaining to her child living with the father.