GUILTY TX - Christina Morris, 23, Plano, 30 Aug 2014 - Enrique Arochi kidnapping trial #6

  • #801
  • #802
  • #803
  • #804
Body found today in Arlington landfill. Christina was my first thought. While I don't want this to be the outcome as least it would provide closure to her loved ones. This is the case that brought me to Websleuths. https://www.dallasnews.com/news/arl...gton-landfill-employee-discovers-body-working

[FONT=&quot]The Tarrant County Medical Examiner's office identified the body Thursday as that of Kaytlynn Cargill.

[/FONT]
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?341077-TX-Kaytlynn-Cargill-14-Bedford-19-June-2017&highlight=Kaytlynn+Cargill[FONT=&quot]

[/FONT]
 
  • #805
Bumping for Christina
 
  • #806
  • #807
Could someone please post timeline for me? I can't seem to remember how to find it. Thanks!
 
  • #808
  • #809
The bones found are confirmed to be human.
Where is this relative to EA's route that evening?

EA travelled east to Allen.
Southlake is west from the Shops at Legacy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #810
  • #811
http://www.search.txcourts.gov/Case.aspx?cn=05-16-01208-CR&coa=coa05
5th COURT OF APPEALS - DALLAS, TEXAS

ISSUE ONE: The evidence is insufficient to prove the Appellant committed the offense of aggravated kidnapping.

ISSUE TWO: The trial court erred in denying Appellant’s request for the jury to be charged on the lesser-included offenses of kidnapping and unlawful restraint.
22 RR 103-06

ISSUE THREE: The trial court erred in denying the Appellant’s motion to change venue because:
a. There was so great a prejudice against Appellant in Collin County he could not obtain a fair and impartial trial; and,
b. The State failed to controvert the Appellant’s affidavits with proper affidavits.
9 RR 9-39; Def’s Venue Ex. 1-7A. 13 RR 102-04.

ISSUE FOUR: The trial court erred in denying the Appellant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained through installation of a tracking device on his vehicle without probable cause.
18 RR 177.

ISSUE FIVE: The trial court erred in overruling Appellant’s objections to a “jury view” of evidence.
20 RR 7-17, 29-30; State’s Exs. 323-29.

ISSUE SIX: The trial court erred in overruling the Appellant’s motion to quash the indictment.
8 RR 40-44.
 
  • #812
http://www.search.txcourts.gov/Case.aspx?cn=05-16-01208-CR&coa=coa05
5th COURT OF APPEALS - DALLAS, TEXAS

ISSUE ONE: The evidence is insufficient to prove the Appellant committed the offense of aggravated kidnapping.

ISSUE TWO: The trial court erred in denying Appellant’s request for the jury to be charged on the lesser-included offenses of kidnapping and unlawful restraint.
22 RR 103-06

ISSUE THREE: The trial court erred in denying the Appellant’s motion to change venue because:
a. There was so great a prejudice against Appellant in Collin County he could not obtain a fair and impartial trial; and,
b. The State failed to controvert the Appellant’s affidavits with proper affidavits.
9 RR 9-39; Def’s Venue Ex. 1-7A. 13 RR 102-04.

ISSUE FOUR: The trial court erred in denying the Appellant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained through installation of a tracking device on his vehicle without probable cause.
18 RR 177.

ISSUE FIVE: The trial court erred in overruling Appellant’s objections to a “jury view” of evidence.
20 RR 7-17, 29-30; State’s Exs. 323-29.

ISSUE SIX: The trial court erred in overruling the Appellant’s motion to quash the indictment.
8 RR 40-44.

Oh no!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #813
http://www.search.txcourts.gov/Case.aspx?cn=05-16-01208-CR&coa=coa05
5th COURT OF APPEALS - DALLAS, TEXAS

ISSUE ONE: The evidence is insufficient to prove the Appellant committed the offense of aggravated kidnapping.

ISSUE TWO: The trial court erred in denying Appellant’s request for the jury to be charged on the lesser-included offenses of kidnapping and unlawful restraint.
22 RR 103-06

ISSUE THREE: The trial court erred in denying the Appellant’s motion to change venue because:
a. There was so great a prejudice against Appellant in Collin County he could not obtain a fair and impartial trial; and,
b. The State failed to controvert the Appellant’s affidavits with proper affidavits.
9 RR 9-39; Def’s Venue Ex. 1-7A. 13 RR 102-04.

ISSUE FOUR: The trial court erred in denying the Appellant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained through installation of a tracking device on his vehicle without probable cause.
18 RR 177.

ISSUE FIVE: The trial court erred in overruling Appellant’s objections to a “jury view” of evidence.
20 RR 7-17, 29-30; State’s Exs. 323-29.

ISSUE SIX: The trial court erred in overruling the Appellant’s motion to quash the indictment.
8 RR 40-44.

TY for the update, so he gets a new trial.
 
  • #814
As I understand it, these are just what is being argued. Nothing has been awarded.
 
  • #815
As I understand it, these are just what is being argued. Nothing has been awarded.

I read it wrong, didn't follow the link :blushing:, thought it was the Appeals court Decision not the defendant's brief.. TY for the correction.
 
  • #816
Investigation discovery.com/tv-shows/see-no-evil/full-episodes/we-never-fight

Christina’s case on ID network series “ see no evil “.
 
  • #817

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
93
Guests online
1,686
Total visitors
1,779

Forum statistics

Threads
632,760
Messages
18,631,349
Members
243,283
Latest member
emilyc1224
Back
Top