CM's DNA was IN HIS TRUNK. I'm sure the defense will try to excuse that away, but even without the massive lying, the phone wipes, the attempts to hide everything, the showing up to work late and beaten, the bite mark, the car wreck, and lots more evidence that we don't know yet, the fact he had her IN HIS TRUNK is imo going to be something he can't explain by simply trying to cast doubt. His "story" was all lies. He clearly is doing his best to keep the truth from being known.
Having her IN HIS TRUNK cannot be explained away as something innocent. She was not there willingly, or because it was somehow the best place for her welfare. There's your crime, and imo that puts him in prison eventually, no matter what else happens.
LE finds evidence. Defendants try to pick and question and cast doubt and deny, and then defendants get convicted because juries have common sense. We don't have to have the answers to the nitpicking on the evidence, because LE will have that for the trial. I have confidence that the members of his jury are not going to lose their minds and let this bad guy get away with what he did to CM.
Having her IN HIS TRUNK cannot be explained away as something innocent. She was not there willingly, or because it was somehow the best place for her welfare. There's your crime, and imo that puts him in prison eventually, no matter what else happens.
LE finds evidence. Defendants try to pick and question and cast doubt and deny, and then defendants get convicted because juries have common sense. We don't have to have the answers to the nitpicking on the evidence, because LE will have that for the trial. I have confidence that the members of his jury are not going to lose their minds and let this bad guy get away with what he did to CM.