GUILTY TX - Christina Morris, 23, Plano, 30 August 2014 - #33 *Arrest*

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #481
JMOM stated it was LoJack. I've had it on a couple vehicles. It's an aftermarket product that you pay extra for and have it installed. (Which totally makes me happy if EA paid for the device that tracked his movements. He may have forgotten he even had it)
I think the main reason people get it is for the discount on auto insurance as it was/is very beneficial in tracking a vehicle should it be stolen.

I am sure PPD installed a tracking device on his car when they searched it.
 
  • #482
JMOM stated it was LoJack. I've had it on a couple vehicles. It's an aftermarket product that you pay extra for and have it installed. (Which totally makes me happy if EA paid for the device that tracked his movements. He may have forgotten he even had it)
I think the main reason people get it is for the discount on auto insurance as it was/is very beneficial in tracking a vehicle should it be stolen.

I am sure PPD installed a tracking device on his car when they searched it the 4th or 5th time.......
 
  • #483
The vacumming of the inside of the car is very odd given that there were visible signs of drug use when LE looked at the car. Maybe he thought he'd got away with it when no-one came to question him in the first couple of days and relaxed enough to smoke in his car, I don't know but I still believe there's a possibility that Christina was in the front of the car at some time.

JMO

So do I, SJ. I can't reconcile the short time frame for abduction plus the fact that she [modsnip] with the lack of blood evidence in the garage, for one thing. Would she only have started bleeding in the trunk? Would he have managed to get her in the trunk, then harm her? I suppose it is possible but it escapes me.
 
  • #484
Maybe he was smoking in the car to through the police off or to try and cover up a smell. I'm sure if he thought they caught him with marijuana it would distract them but obviously he isn't very bright.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #485
"When the substance was sprayed in the trunk, two spots “luminesced faintly,” which Staub said indicated the presence of blood.
“It certainly would be consistent with a bodily injury due to the large quantity of her DNA,” he said."

It sounds as if.......even though the two spots luminesced faintly, they were fairly large spots possibly indicating profuse bleeding.
 
  • #486
They just said two spots. IMO They could have been tiny or huge....

I only remember "significant amounts" - and that it was Christina's. They are still testing the mat (or so they say).
 
  • #487
"When the substance was sprayed in the trunk, two spots “luminesced faintly,” which Staub said indicated the presence of blood.
“It certainly would be consistent with a bodily injury due to the large quantity of her DNA,” he said."

It sounds as if.......even though the two spots luminesced faintly, they were fairly large spots possibly indicating profuse bleeding.

I, completely, disagree.
Two spots is two spots.
 
  • #488
I think its very possible.
As we have seen the cameras didn't cover everything!.

Why would EA return and put her, dead or dying, in his trunk, then?
 
  • #489
"When the substance was sprayed in the trunk, two spots “luminesced faintly,” which Staub said indicated the presence of blood.
“It certainly would be consistent with a bodily injury due to the large quantity of her DNA,” he said."

It sounds as if.......even though the two spots luminesced faintly, they were fairly large spots possibly indicating profuse bleeding.

Until we know exactly how much blood was found in the trunk this is purely speculation. To put DNA amounts into perspective:
"A one foot long string or strand of DNA is normally packed into a space roughly equal to a cube 1/millionth of an inch on a side. This is possible only because DNA is a very thin string."

http://www.scientific.org/tutorials/articles/riley/riley.html
 
  • #490
Until we have a link that says so please do not assume as fact that Christina was BLEEDING PROFUSELY.

Do not bring this up again unless it is with a link from a source that is accepted at Websleuths.


 
  • #491
Well crap. That makes me think of what kind of tracking devise maybe on my car. Yikes

I'm sure they're talking about OnStar. That's what I have in my Tahoe. It comes standard in most, if not all, GM vehicles. But, I don't think it tracks you, or has ability to track your car unless you activate/pay for service. We have it, it's good for emergencies.
 
  • #492
I'm sure they're talking about OnStar. That's what I have in my Tahoe. It comes standard in most, if not all, GM vehicles. But, I don't think it tracks you, or has ability to track your car unless you activate/pay for service. We have it, it's good for emergencies.

I thought so, too.
Apparently, this is not the case.
Big brother is watching and tracking us, Ahintexas!!!

http://www.wired.com/2011/09/onstar-tracks-you/


“What’s changed [is that if] you want to cancel your OnStar service, we are going to maintain a two-way connection to your vehicle unless the customer says otherwise,” Denison said in a telephone interview.

The connection will continue, he said, to make it “easier to re-enroll” in the program, which charges plans from $19 to $29 monthly for help with navigation and emergencies. Canceling customers must opt out of the continued surveillance monitoring program, according to the privacy policy.

The privacy changes take effect in December, Denison said, adding that the policy reinforces the company’s right to sell anonymized data.

“We hear from organizations periodically requesting our information,” he said.
 
  • #493
Until we know exactly how much blood was found in the trunk this is purely speculation. To put DNA amounts into perspective:
"A one foot long string or strand of DNA is normally packed into a space roughly equal to a cube 1/millionth of an inch on a side. This is possible only because DNA is a very thin string."

http://www.scientific.org/tutorials/articles/riley/riley.html

But the DNA was not specified to be blood, right? I mean I get the two spots but they could also be referencing other types of DNA. Am I correct in assuming this?
 
  • #494
  • #495
I'm sure they're talking about OnStar. That's what I have in my Tahoe. It comes standard in most, if not all, GM vehicles. But, I don't think it tracks you, or has ability to track your car unless you activate/pay for service. We have it, it's good for emergencies.
MOMOFFOURBOYS BEAT ME TO THE PUNCH
Here's an interesting article stating that OnStar continues to track movement even after cancellation of service unless the owner specifically says not to. Privacy policy says that they can track you for any purpose.
http://www.wired.com/2011/09/onstar-tracks-you/
 
  • #496
  • #497
http://www.wfaa.com/story/news/loca...egacy-equusearch-find-missing-woman/15366369/
"I just want her to come home and be alive," he said.

Foster said he regrets not being there early Saturday morning when Morris vanished. She had spent Friday night and early Saturday morning out with her girlfriends. Surveillance images show Morris with a friend walking through a garage at the Shops at Legacy.

"If I would have been there, none of this would have happened," Foster lamented

This makes me think that he felt a sense of guilt - not that he personally did anything, BUT IF EA was upset about getting/not getting some good drugs and took it out on Christina, then he may have felt responsible. JMO
 
  • #498
I am sure PPD installed a tracking device on his car when they searched it.

Doesn't seem to have helped, though. They took the car, what, three times in September? If he'd been driving back to the places where she was, they'd have picked it up long before his arrest.

Just another thing that could bolster the point of the possible involvement of others. If one of those took her body at the end, EA really might not know where she is.
 
  • #499
But the DNA was not specified to be blood, right? I mean I get the two spots but they could also be referencing other types of DNA. Am I correct in assuming this?

Staubb (crime scene investigator) said they used Blue Star and that indicated blood.
From Feagans's article of notes:
"Criminalists used Blue Star to locate two spots indicating the presence of blood in the trunk. The samples contained a mixture of Morris’ DNA and at least one other person. They did not have Arochi’s DNA at the time to compare."

http://m.starlocalmedia.com/allenam...862-9de4-11e4-b48e-5765cf2b7e65.html?mode=jqm
 
  • #500
I thought so, too.
Apparently, this is not the case.
Big brother is watching and tracking us, Ahintexas!!!

http://www.wired.com/2011/09/onstar-tracks-you/


“What’s changed [is that if] you want to cancel your OnStar service, we are going to maintain a two-way connection to your vehicle unless the customer says otherwise,” Denison said in a telephone interview.

The connection will continue, he said, to make it “easier to re-enroll” in the program, which charges plans from $19 to $29 monthly for help with navigation and emergencies. Canceling customers must opt out of the continued surveillance monitoring program, according to the privacy policy.

The privacy changes take effect in December, Denison said, adding that the policy reinforces the company’s right to sell anonymized data.

“We hear from organizations periodically requesting our information,” he said.

Ha! Doesn't bother me! If they want to track the crazy days of this dance mom, more power to them. ;) I honestly love OnStar. It's come in handy traveling by myself with a small baby, and had no cell phone reception.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
84
Guests online
2,870
Total visitors
2,954

Forum statistics

Threads
632,806
Messages
18,631,956
Members
243,299
Latest member
2Phaze
Back
Top