GUILTY TX - Christina Morris, 23, Plano, 30 August 2014 - #39 *Arrest*

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #501
Well, someone has been charged with the murder of Ashley Pegram in SC based on blood in the trunk, despite no body being found. Makes me wonder why LE does things so differently in different places! I assume they have far more blood and DNA evidence in Ashley's case. I'm using tapatalk app so I can't link the WS post on her, sorry!
 
  • #502
  • #503
Per the article in the thread linked above, blood was found IN HIS TRUNK as well as "other location(S) under his control."

I'm guessing there was enough blood to determine she could not live through that much blood loss.

I'm also guessing there's not enough of Christina's blood to determine she is deceased, hence no murder charge for EA. JMO
 
  • #504
Per the article in the thread linked above, blood was found IN HIS TRUNK as well as "other location(S) under his control."

I'm guessing there was enough blood to determine she could not live through that much blood loss.

I'm also guessing there's not enough of Christina's blood to determine she is deceased, hence no murder charge for EA. JMO

If there were that much blood why was it not found the.first three times they searched his.car?
Makes.no sense to me.
 
  • #505
  • #506
If there were that much blood why was it not found the.first three times they searched his.car?
Makes.no sense to me.

IMO, I don't believe there was that much blood found. DNA, yes, but not much actual blood.
 
  • #507
Interesting. Here's the article.

http://www.live5news.com/story/2898...ville-womans-disappearance?clienttype=generic

It seems that there are a lot more "no body" murder cases than one would expect. Curious. Why just the kidnapping charge if they have a terabyte of evidence against EA? What happened to CHRISTINA?

The evidence turned over is probably everything they have sifted through and likely only a bit pertaining to the actual case. Which makes me wonder, does the prosecution have to specifically state what evidence they're using or can they just dump a bunch of stuff on the defence and make them figure it out?
 
  • #508
  • #509
They can charge him with aggravated kidnapping, for now, which can carry a long sentence and they believe they can win. They can add murder when they are ready.
 
  • #510
But, that's not really how it works, is it? What about the right to a fair and speedy trial? Why waste all this time?
 
  • #511
But, that's not really how it works, is it? What about the right to a fair and speedy trial? Why waste all this time?

I can't help but think of the Dylan Redwine case where it's rumored there's a ton of evidence yet no charges have been filed. It makes me think PPD have nothing to support a murder case and so they're forced to charge with kidnapping. EA will get maybe 20 years with parole likely after 10. JMO He will NOT get 99 years like so many are hoping. I've seen convicted murderers get less. JMO
 
  • #512
But, that's not really how it works, is it? What about the right to a fair and speedy trial? Why waste all this time?

EA would have to be the one complaining about a speedy trial. Many states do not have a set amount of time. Texas seems to be one of those. It has to be an unreasonable amount of time and since EA is scheduled for November, I think, that would be a little under a year. And having a quick trial is really only helpful, Imo, if you are...innocent. Jmo
 
  • #513
EA would have to be the one complaining about a speedy trial. Many states do not have a set amount of time. Texas seems to be one of those. It has to be an unreasonable amount of time and since EA is scheduled for November, I think, that would be a little under a year. And having a quick trial is really only helpful, Imo, if you are...innocent. Jmo

BBM or you're confident the body won't be found.

ETA MOOOOO
 
  • #514
But, that's not really how it works, is it? What about the right to a fair and speedy trial? Why waste all this time?

Defendant's get a speedy trial when they ask for one, I believe.
 
  • #515
But, that's not really how it works, is it? What about the right to a fair and speedy trial? Why waste all this time?

He's getting his speedy trial, for AK. Until that's over, then they charge him with another crime the clock starts over. Who's time are they wasting? l wouldn't be very concerned with his time, only about his next victim. This way cuts out a lot of the worry about a lot of stuff.
 
  • #516
But, that's not really how it works, is it? What about the right to a fair and speedy trial? Why waste all this time?

This is what a "speedy" trial often looks like. Don't lose sight of the fact that the defense wants plenty of time to examine the evidence and see if they can figure out some way to answer it, and the trial date was set by the judge using input from BOTH sides.

And it's certainly not a "waste" of time, to put someone on trial for committing a major felony that compelling evidence says they did.
 
  • #517
Why is this an Aggravated Kidnaping and not an abduction?

Did EA Demand something from her BF?

The elements of aggravated kidnapping are: (1) the forcible seizing and; (2) the carrying of any person from one place to another (the asportation element); (3) with the intent to force the victim, or some other person, to give up anything of apparent present or prospective value (the extortion element); and (4) in order to secure the release of that person
 
  • #518
Why is this an Aggravated Kidnaping and not an abduction?

Did EA Demand something from her BF?

The elements of aggravated kidnapping are: (1) the forcible seizing and; (2) the carrying of any person from one place to another (the asportation element); (3) with the intent to force the victim, or some other person, to give up anything of apparent present or prospective value (the extortion element); and (4) in order to secure the release of that person
Remember Tillery told us that if we saw all the evidence we would understand.
 
  • #519
Why is this an Aggravated Kidnaping and not an abduction?

Did EA Demand something from her BF?

The elements of aggravated kidnapping are: (1) the forcible seizing and; (2) the carrying of any person from one place to another (the asportation element); (3) with the intent to force the victim, or some other person, to give up anything of apparent present or prospective value (the extortion element); and (4) in order to secure the release of that person

LE, Prosecution, The Judge all agree that this is an AK case. The bond was not lowered & EA was indicted. Personally, I won't question the experts as to whether AK is the appropriate criminal charge. Below are the elements of AK:

Texas Penal Code:

Sec. 20.04. AGGRAVATED KIDNAPPING. (a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally or knowingly abducts another person with the intent to:
(1) hold him for ransom or reward;
(2) use him as a shield or hostage;
(3) facilitate the commission of a felony or the flight after the attempt or commission of a felony;
(4) inflict bodily injury on him or violate or abuse him sexually;
(5) terrorize him or a third person; or
(6) interfere with the performance of any governmental or political function.
(b) A person commits an offense if the person intentionally or knowingly abducts another person and uses or exhibits a deadly weapon during the commission of the offense.
(c) Except as provided by Subsection (d), an offense under this section is a felony of the first degree.
(d) At the punishment stage of a trial, the defendant may raise the issue as to whether he voluntarily released the victim in a safe place. If the defendant proves the issue in the affirmative by a preponderance of the evidence, the offense is a felony of the second degree.

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=texas+penal+code+aggravated+kidnapping
 
  • #520
Why is this an Aggravated Kidnaping and not an abduction?

Did EA Demand something from her BF?

The elements of aggravated kidnapping are: (1) the forcible seizing and; (2) the carrying of any person from one place to another (the asportation element); (3) with the intent to force the victim, or some other person, to give up anything of apparent present or prospective value (the extortion element); and (4) in order to secure the release of that person

Abduction is a descriptive term, that legally in Texas refers to certain illegal acts, but there is no such thing as "the crime of Abduction" in Texas. If someone like EA abducts someone else, he will be arrested and charged under one of the various statutes that most defines the specifics of the abduction that occurred.

Zippixx has posted the description in statute 20.04, which is what EA has been charged with, and what LE believes the evidence shows happened here. In general terms, CM was kidnapped, per the evidence.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
100
Guests online
2,701
Total visitors
2,801

Forum statistics

Threads
632,864
Messages
18,632,777
Members
243,317
Latest member
Sfebruary
Back
Top