GUILTY TX - Emma Thompson, 4, dies with STD, skull fracture, Spring, 27 June 2009

Originally Posted by mnm55
On 8/16/2010 Abigail Young completed a voluntary surrender of her Texas nursing license.

I hope that means she can never re-apply for another nursing license.

Welcome to WS and Thank You for following up on this. The Texas Board of Nursing - discipline roster is current thru June 2010 - so I hadn't caught the surrender.

SECOND AMENDED FORMAL CHARGES​

On or about Oct 29, 2009, Respondent was indicted on a state felony offense in Harris Co .... SERIOUS BODILY INJURY to Emma Thompson, a child under 15 years of age, by failing to provide adequate medical attention....

On July 12, 2010, Respondent was convicted of a lessor offense of RECKLESS SERIOUS BODILY INJURY TO A CHILD BY OMISSION, a 2nd Degree Felony in violation of...... Respondent was sentenced to twenty (20) years confinement and assessed a fine in the amount of $10,000.

The above action constitutes grounds for disciplinary action....

NOTICE IS GIVEN that the staff will present evidence in support of recommended disposition of up to revocation of Respondent's license to practice nursing in the State of Texas pursuant to the Boards rules....

Additionally, staff will seek to impose on Respondent the administrative costs (investigative, court reporter, witnesses, reproduction of records, Board staff time, travel, and expenses.) These shall be in an amount of at least $1200.00.

According to the specific surrender:

Dear Texas Board of Nursing (August 4,2010)

I no longer desire to be licensed as a professional nurse.* Accordingly, I voluntarily surrender my license to practice in Texas. I consent to the entry of an Order which outlines requirements for reinstatement of my license. I understand that I will be required to comply with the Board's Rules and Regulations in effect at the time I submit any petition for reinstatement.


Date 8/4/2010 - Signature: A Young
Texas Nursing License Number 677580


Notarized by Kathy Stuil 4/Aug/2010

*This is BS - one way or another, by virtue of her felony conviction the license was going. This makes it appear she had a choice in the matter!

Order of the Board

...The Board accepted the voluntary surrender of RNLN, issued to ABIGAIL ELIZABETH YOUNG, (Respondent). ...in accordance with Section 301.453(c) Texas Occupations Code.

Respondent waved counsel.....

1. Respondent shall (handover) her license, to the State Board.

2. Respondent shall not practice or represent herself to be an RN.....

3.Respondent shall not petition for reinstatement of licensure until one (1) year has elapsed from date of Order.

4. Upon petitioning for reinstatement Respondent shall satisfy all then existing requirements.

It is further agreed and ordered that this Order Shall be applicable to Respondent's compact privileges** (if any) to practice professional nursing in the State of Texas.

**privileges that allow a nurse licensed in another state to practice in Texas or licensed in Texas (in Young's case) to practice in another state.

Effective 16th of August, 2010.

NOTICE IS GIVEN.... ADOPTED DISCIPLINARY GUIDELINES FOR CRIMINAL CONDUCT, FOUND AT:

https://www.bon.state.tx.us/discipli...scp-guide.html

The board may require evaluations from Board-approved evaluators to better determine the appropriate recommendation and/or to determine whether an individual is safe to practice nursing and able to comply with the NPA and Board's rules and regulations. The Board will also consider an offense under the law of another state, federal law, or the Uniform Code of Military Justice that contains elements that are substantially similar to the elements of an offense listed in this guideline. Other applicable laws and rules are Texas Occupations Code ch. 53 and 22 Texas Administrative Code §§ 213.27 - 213.30.

Adopted Disciplinary Matrix​

§301.452(b)(4) conduct that results in the revocation of probation imposed, because of conviction for a felony or for a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude.

Eligibility and Discipline will be reviewed under Board’s Disciplinary Guidelines for Criminal Conduct published at:

http://www.bon.state.tx.us/disciplin...scp-guide.html.

The Board will also utilize 22 Tex. Admin. Code 213.28, the Occupations Code §301.4535, and the Occupations Code Chapter 53, including §53.021(b), which provides that a license holder’s license shall be revoked on the license holder's imprisonment following a felony conviction, felony community supervision revocation, revocation of parole, or revocation of mandatory supervision.

Rationale for How Crimes Relate to the Practice of Nursing:

Offense Against the Person that involves behavior where the offender engages in conduct that falls below the standard required of ordinary people and a death results. Nurses, by virtue of their license, must hold to a higher standard of conduct where the risk to life and limb is the norm. A person who engages in conduct that falls below ordinary standards when life is at risk raises serious questions about the ability to comply when there is a higher standard of care and where a patient’s health is at risk.

Issue License w/ stipulations if not on felony probation; if on felony probation, Deny/Revoke

If judicial order for conviction or deferred adjudication occurred 0-5 years ago Deny/Revoke

Third Tier Offense:

Practice below standard with a serious risk of harm or death that is known or should be known. Act or omission that demonstrates level of incompetence such that the person should not practice without remediation and subsequent demonstration of competency. In addition, any intentional act or omission that risks or results in serious harm.

Sanction Level I:

Denial, suspension of license; revocation of license or request for voluntary surrender.


Aggravating Circumstances for §301.452(b)(13): Number of events, actual harm, impairment at time of incident, severity of harm, prior complaints or discipline for similar conduct, patient vulnerability, failure to demonstrate competent nursing practice consistently during nursing career.

Because these findings are multiple pages long I have taken a few shortcuts in reproducing them here, without changing their meaning.

I guess as I get older and wiser, I'm learning: "never, say never" is a good mantra when it comes to dealing with the law in general - it appears the felony conviction will prevent Abby from practicing nursing at least thru her sentence and any parole, some statements in the matrix appear to say she will not be relicensed ever - but because each case is determined by their own merits - I am not willing to say that what I have read on the Disciplinary Board Site - means she will never work as an RN again.
 
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/7198047.html

For eight years, accused child rapist Lucas Coe fended off a bevy of criminal charges that until today had little chance of keeping him behind bars.

There was a 2002 aggravated assault in Harris County, a DWI conviction that left him without a driver's license, a Montgomery County assault charge, the two times he was jailed for probation violations and in 2007, a Montgomery County child abuse charge that even now has yet to go to trial.

Today, though, he is on trial — this time charged with sexually assaulting 4-year-old Emma Thompson who died in June 2009, the result of multiple unexplained injuries. Coe, 28, is not charged in her death.
 
http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/local&id=7663134

Trial to begin for Houston man accused of raping toddler

Lucas Coe is charged with sexually assaulting his girlfriend's daughter, Emma Thompson. She died in June of 2009 from head trauma, but Coe is not charged in her death. Coe was apparently not supposed to have any contact with baby Emma, or any other child.
 
Why don't these grown men stop tormenting and picking on women and children and start messing with someone their own size, like me for instance. Why can't they make it a little more interesting for themselves and stop being such weak-minded, panzies? I would give this guy that butt whooping he's always deserved. I'm not small by any means, but I know better than to pick on people smaller and weaker than me.
 
It really sticks in my craw that nobody has been charged with the murder of Emma.
 
It really sticks in my craw that nobody has been charged with the murder of Emma.

Ditto, B-I can almost guarantee you LE feels the same way. It was a homicide investigation that included the violent rape of a child. And no one is going to call it by that name?

Bio dad must be heartbroken.
 
That poor baby was violently murdered and I fail to understand why they can't prove it. Do they really believe she did all those injuries to herself? I realize there is a lot to LE that I don't understand. I'm thinking it comes down to being able to prove which one inflicted the fatal blows. As far as I'm concerned, if they can't decide, charge them both. They were both clearly in on it and covering it up. I know that is easy for me to say because I'm not the one that has to prove it. It just deeply disturbs me that neither one is going down for murder.
 
"The bottom line is ... there is no direct evidence," Van Buren said, adding that Coe's DNA was not found on the little girl. "There could be other ways for vaginal tears to occur, other possibilities."

----

Just like there's other explanations for genital herpes in a toddler. Good grief! Does he really think a jury is going to be able to suspend common sense to the point that vaginal tears + herpes doesn't = sexual abuse??

And- I'm so upset that the State can't introduce evidence that Coe shouldn't have been around kids in the first place. He was violent! It seems like that should be a factor that the jury needs to consider.


Prayers for Emma....
 
"The bottom line is ... there is no direct evidence," Van Buren said, adding that Coe's DNA was not found on the little girl. "There could be other ways for vaginal tears to occur, other possibilities."

----

Just like there's other explanations for genital herpes in a toddler. Good grief! Does he really think a jury is going to be able to suspend common sense to the point that vaginal tears + herpes doesn't = sexual abuse??

And- I'm so upset that the State can't introduce evidence that Coe shouldn't have been around kids in the first place. He was violent! It seems like that should be a factor that the jury needs to consider.


Prayers for Emma....

Even if there is no direct evidence, many people have been sent to the slammer with circumstantial evidence. Trying the case on circumstantial evidence is a whole lot better than not trying the case at all.
 
I hate to say this outloud, but there is something about this case that smacks of influence peddling. JMVHO. I hope there are some interested reporters out there who are still digging around.

It is hard to believe that felony child abuse is a sufficient charge given the magnitude of emma's suffering, regardless of whether or not it carries a similar penalty to a murder charge.

Coe has to be on three strikes you are out by now...is TX a practitioner of that?
 
Please continue here. Coe's trial is starting. His attorney says there is no direct evidence to connect him to little Emma's death. Let's see what the jury has to say about that!

Thread 1


Salem
 
I'm too angry that there is no murder charge. Whatever he is convicted of wont be justice IMO.
 
I would like to know who the possible perps are other than Coe and Bio Mom. Are they accusing each other or the other children in the house?

And I would like to know additional causes of vaginal lacerations in a 4 year old...we know the pool defense presented by Abby is completely unrealistic. So, let's see, we could have Emma injuring herself with an object, Abby injuring Emma with an object, Coe injuring Emma with an object or what, one of the other children?

Really? Cause it seems like these are the only options, unless a stranger came in off of the street and targeted this child with both Coe and Abby in the house or at least Coe in the house.

If Coe and or Abby caused the murder to occur without direct evidence that they participated in it, they are still up for a murder charge. At least if my Law and Order references are correct, lol.

So. Not. Getting. It.
 
http://www.39online.com/news/local/kiah-coe-assault-story,0,6691763.story

Child Protective Services had banned him from even seeing his own daughter unsupervised, after a previous abuse allegation. Pretrial rulings indicate that can't brought up in this case.
Opening statements begin tomorrow.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/7198047.html

Harris County Assistant District Attorney Colleen Barnett said that based on the evidence, prosecutors decided a charge of super-aggravated sexual assault of a child under the age of 6 was the best case to pursue against Coe. If jurors convict him, she added, there's no parole.

"So whatever he gets, he serves," she said.
 
http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/local&id=7663134

"The pictures are disturbing. The facts are disturbing," said prosecutor Colleen Barnett. "To think that a little girl who was just barely four, she was three, was sexually assaulted, and is just difficult for people to understand and comprehend and to think that that really happens. So I just want the jury to pay careful attention to the evidence."

Defense attorney William Van Buren said, "Don't get me wrong, the death was tragic. But certainly we don't believe there is any direct evidence that links our client to sexually assaulting this girl by any means."

Because of Emma's young age, the charge is super aggravated, meaning that if he's convicted, Coe would serve whatever sentence he receives without parole. If convicted he could get 25 years to life in prison.
 
The DA's office is hedging their bets thinking that we as the public will be grateful that he would not be eligible for parole if he is convicted?

WTF, I have to say in strong language. 80 INJURIES. Severed Pancreas, Fractured SKULL, VIOLENT RAPE. Coe was alone in the house with her, there is a child who is a direct witness to his treatment of her when other adults were not around. AND he was not allowed to be around children period.

I can see where that might be too predjudicial, after all he was a serial rapist of children. And abuser.

I just want to freakin howl. Really. AP or media, this is influence peddling.....please dig around.
 
:banghead: :furious: :banghead: :furious: :banghead: :furious: :banghead:

From fhc's link: http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/7198047.html
"Coe's defense attorney William Van Buren insists there was no sexual assault of Emma. The vaginal tear, Van Buren says, could have been caused by anything.

"The bottom line is ... there is no direct evidence," Van Buren said, adding that Coe's DNA was not found on the little girl. "There could be other ways for vaginal tears to occur, other possibilities."" - IN A FOUR YEAR OLD!! EXCUSE ME??? What, like Emma slipped, tripped and fell on his you-know-what accidentially on purpose?? :doh:

:snooty: I'm not buying this load of craptastic garbage! I would like to give Mr. Van Buren an anatomy lesson......

AND

"That night, Young came home to find her daughter, who had been left with Coe, nearly unconscious. She carried Emma from the house to the car to take her to the hospital, claiming then and in testimony later that she believed her daughter to be the victim of a fall in the bathroom.

But instead of waiting with Emma's two older sisters for word from the hospital, witnesses say Coe ran to a neighbor, asking her to watch the girls. He also asked the neighbor to take him and his own young daughter to a nearby Jack-in-the-Box where his sister, who lived 20 miles away, was going to pick them up". - hmmmmmm. Would an innocent person do this???? :liar:
 
I would like to know why evidence that he was banned from being around children is barred from the trial. It certainly seems to be part of a large pattern with him. Why is this being kept out? If this guy, by some miracle, gets off, I don't know what I will do.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
158
Guests online
897
Total visitors
1,055

Forum statistics

Threads
626,624
Messages
18,529,765
Members
241,100
Latest member
citizenjane
Back
Top