If you're interested, this study says that of all juveniles in detention facilities who said they had been abused, 95% said the offender was female. I wouldn't got so far as to say the numbers are equal but they're not as far apart as people think.
I have always thought there are more female pedophiles than people think. People do not look for the unexpected. IMO, it is similar to people thinking that mothers are always caring and protective of their children. Reminds me of the myth that serial killers are all white. IMO, Evil does not discriminate by gender, race, religion, etc., but it may manifest itself differently. I do think male pedophiles and serial killers far outnumber female pedophiles and female serial killers, but many of the males do have participating or consenting partners in their crimes, and females can commit such crimes on their own, often under the radar.
Russell
Houston we have a problem. I mean Dallas. This is so disturbing on so many levels. Besides being a creepy pervert who exploited little babies this "person" is a mother for the love of all things decent. Everytime I read of a woman daring to hurt a child like this I get physically sick. We've discussed the male vs female ratio in childbefore, but for flippin ten years? How many women like this are out there?
Now for the media. Define "socialite" because if this chick is a "socialite" then I'm a right member of royalty. Define "mansion". Lovely home. It ain't no mansion. Does one not have an interior designer come into a mansion? Define "wealth". I got more loot than I knew if this woman is moneteraly rich.
Again this is all an aside and the impact of her alleged crime outweighs the description of her life, but someone on Huffington Post linked to her FB. They asked the same thing as I did. This "person" is no Deb. Even more so she smacks of a lower socio economic background than most of us I bet. That's fine as long as you don't hurt innocent children.
No way will I link to the FB as there's a few photos of kids. Lovely, gorgeous kids. Couple that with an abundance of photo's of herself and her HOUSE and CARS which seem to be a real huge deal to her the "lawyer" husband is non existent in them.
No, Erika Perdue of Garland, Texas has big problems and it's not just what will be her jail time I hope.
Best of all is she enjoys Glam Rock. Hey, why not spend your perverted hours googling groups? Wait for it.................she loves Britny Fox. They're a Philly based group and I grew up with one of the members. Sure, sure socialites can do Glam Rock, but this whole story is messed up!!!!!!!
Prayers for probably more than hundreds of children this wench exploited. Hoping she downsizes to a cell. Then she won't be asking men if they saw her new "Caddy". A flippin Caddy. Yes sir, socialites you know you say that every single day.
The world has gone mad. Mad, mad, mad.
THANKS Filly for calling it as it is!
You said BETTER all I would have said.
Well, except for the part about knowing members of a Glam Rock band.
That makes your post even more impressive! LOL
Yours is my favorite post so far today.
Dr. Berlin, are you kidding????? So child"peddling" does not harm children? Are you certain about that? Let's ask some of the victims of this heinous crime.
http://news.yahoo.com/wealthy-texas...-175257313.html;_ylt=A2KJjb2BDtVPHBwAoojQtDMD
"....Psychiatrist Fred Berlin, director of the Sexual Behavior Consultation Unit at Johns Hopkins University, said it's unusual for a woman to access images of childbut not outside the realm of possibility. Such a woman may have been abused herself as a child, he said. "It's the exception to the rule, but it's certainly an exception that's not unheard of," Berlin said. Berlin stressed that viewing or collecting child
doesn't mean a person is likely to harm children...."
More at link
btw i mean the enablers, not like the poor LE who HAVE to view the films/photos to investigate them
Can you imagine those poor investigators :what: What they have to see and look at?
God Bless them for that. It has got to be hell.
20 years would take her back to 1992, not 1999 - what am I missing?