That's pretty fascinating, to me! I have never doubted that Amber was at Botham's door by accident/mistake, but it's her excessive force following that mistake that turns into criminal behavior, IMHO.Joshua is testifying about how he had gone to the wrong floor in the apartment building a few times, and even put his key in the wrong apartment door before and then realized it was the wrong door.
And, so much discussion around this case misses the entire point, in my book. Why does it matter if she was exchanging explicit texts or whatever with her partner beforehand? She made terrible decisions that night, which ended in the death of an innocent person, but isn't the key question here only this: Were her actions accidental or did she set out to murder Mr. Jean.
And, so much discussion around this case misses the entire point, in my book. Why does it matter if she was exchanging explicit texts or whatever with her partner beforehand? She made terrible decisions that night, which ended in the death of an innocent person, but isn't the key question here only this: Were her actions accidental or did she set out to murder Mr. Jean.
Once she was in the room, she set out to murder Mr. Jean.
From the get-go I have speculated this was always about the pot smell.Neighbor testifying management knocked on his door (and Botham's) early afternoon (day of shooting). They said it was a noise complaint, but neighbor says their was no noise.
ETA: He spoke with Botham and they thought it was really about them smoking weed.
Gitana, your posts are always excellent! You definitely have that "lawerly" quality, in that you keep keep to logic and facts, separating out emotion, fallacy, etc.
I do quibble a bit with your last comment here, though: My impression of AG is that she was woefully out of her depth as a police officer, trained or not. She was coming off of about 40 hours of work in 4 days, seemingly engrossed in her "after hours life" (who wouldn't be after getting off that schedule!), and as such, and having lived in the building for less than two months (I believe), wasn't noticing much about her surroundings, except that they are seemed similar in general.
She comes upon the door, believing that someone is in her apartment and coming at her, and freaks out, shooting him. Everything immediately after is just shock. It reads to me less like lack of character and more like a person who is significantly unfit, no matter how highly trained, to be in her line of work, which requires functioning in the most extreme situations, despite emotions, etc.
Just my two cents.
And, so much discussion around this case misses the entire point, in my book. Why does it matter if she was exchanging explicit texts or whatever with her partner beforehand? She made terrible decisions that night, which ended in the death of an innocent person, but isn't the key question here only this: Were her actions accidental or did she set out to murder Mr. Jean.
Maybe that’s all he has, or maybe that is just authentically him.I know as a juror, you are instructed to dress appropriately for court. Isn't the same true for witnesses? I am guessing not.
Gitana, your posts are always excellent! You definitely have that "lawerly" quality, in that you keep keep to logic and facts, separating out emotion, fallacy, etc.
I do quibble a bit with your last comment here, though: My impression of AG is that she was woefully out of her depth as a police officer, trained or not. She was coming off of about 40 hours of work in 4 days, seemingly engrossed in her "after hours life" (who wouldn't be after getting off that schedule!), and as such, and having lived in the building for less than two months (I believe), wasn't noticing much about her surroundings, except that they are seemed similar in general.
She comes upon the door, believing that someone is in her apartment and coming at her, and freaks out, shooting him. Everything immediately after is just shock. It reads to me less like lack of character and more like a person who is significantly unfit, no matter how highly trained, to be in her line of work, which requires functioning in the most extreme situations, despite emotions, etc.
Just my two cents.
I mean really....really.This was her second shooting.
Evidence about a previous shooting
The jury may hear about the time in 2017 that Guyger shot a suspect.
She was not indicted in the shooting of Uvaldo Perez, who had wrestled a Taser away from her.
What evidence could jurors hear during Amber Guyger’s murder trial in the death of Botham Jean?
Well glad you are still around to share that story!!!!! Let me guess. He was texting?It's possible. I do think moments of extreme stress show who we are though. Do we run and abandon our loved ones or friends? Do we unthinkingly jump into the fray to help others.
She immediately began thinking about and protecting her job. Her body language with legs akimbo as she texts may show someone who feels confident that her department will protect her.
I feel very sure that she was more concerned about herself than impacted by the accidental shooting by her of an innocent man and his dying breaths.
That bothers me.
I feel a lot of people would be horror stricken and desperate to save him.
I was hit by a car a few weeks ago as I walked across the street with my law partner. He rolled across the roof and I flew back and landed on my butt. I was afraid I broke my leg.
The driver who was clearly in error, came running over to me and immediately held my hand and looked appalled. He said "Oh my gosh I'm so sorry! It was my fault!" He was clearly super worried for me.
The guy felt so bad. He has been texting since to check on me.
I think that goes to his character.
Current witness is another male who lived on the 4th floor, unit 1474.
This testimony will be used by defence. The open parking and red rug should be mentioned by prosecution, if defence brings another witness who says the same.Joshua is testifying about how he had gone to the wrong floor in the apartment building a few times, and even put his key in the wrong apartment door before and then realized it was the wrong door.
That's pretty fascinating, to me! I have never doubted that Amber was at Botham's door by accident/mistake, but it's her excessive force following that mistake that turns into criminal behavior, IMHO.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.