kittythehare
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2016
- Messages
- 18,562
- Reaction score
- 109,263
<snip>
In a March 9, 2018, exchange of text messages with a married officer and her former police partner, Martin Rivera, with whom Guyger was having a sexual relationship, she mocked black officers.
"Damn I was at this area with 5 different black officers !!! Not racists but damn," Rivera wrote.
"Not racist but just have a different way of working and it shows," Guyger replied.
Snipped and BBM“You’re having people of color that have the opportunity to make judges now,” Watkins said. “Their life experience and their religious points of view are different than what we’ve seen in the past. That’s just the evolution of our judicial system.”
<snip>
Dallas judge’s hug prompts debate: admirable compassion or ‘abuse of power?’
Nice thought that this "this might be a bit of a turning point" ...i think the same each time we have an officer involved shooting or mass murder...but it never changes...all is forgotten quickly....but we can hope.I would never comment on the 2nd amendment, not being an American citizen I really don't think it is my place. I wouldn't like to insult US culture any more than I would any other culture I have not experienced. It's a difficult thing; I think because we are so different as a society, British techniques would most likely not be effective for US policing. However, most other police forces across Europe, Australia and NZ are routinely armed but they don't have the same 'shoot first, ask questions later' problem.
I'm not sure what the answer is. I might be naive but I see some hope that this might be a bit of a turning point, if not for US society as a whole at least for Dallas PD to build better relationships with the communities they serve, at least that is what I'm hoping for. It's heartbreaking to hear of such senseless loss of life. We have our own problems here with terrorism and knife crime but I do believe that by working together, over time these issues can go some way towards being resolved.
ETA: where I come from we do actually have a big problem with gun crime. It rubs me up the wrong way when people try and pretend that we don't. Criminals still carry weapons despite our very stringent gun control.
Juror has a great point that if Bo had been shot and lived he probably would of forgiven AG.
thanks so much for that...hum eye for eye ...some really did not like that 28 year idea for the birthday...also texts did not impact them. interesting...they sure seem like reasonable people and good for them for doing an interview to help us understand."It felt like they were asking for an eye for an eye for Botham. And I felt like he was somebody who wouldn't take an eye for an eye," said Juror 21.
"We understand that it was a mistake. And 10 years would be enough time for [Guyger] to get back out there and try to do something better with her life," said Juror 34.
The jurors were not in court to hear the victim impact statement from Jean's younger brother, Brandt Jean, when he expressed forgiveness for Guyger and embraced her. They said seeing the video later made them even more confident in their decisions.
Jurors in Amber Guyger trial describe how they made their decision
They are talking
He is an extraordinary person. What he said about needing peace of mind and waking up happy, he is so right.full interview with Botham's brother, open to Europeans
Botham Jean's brother on courtroom hug with Amber Guyger: 'She still deserves love'
In an interview airing Friday on "Good Morning America," Juror 21 and 34, as identified by the court, revealed how they came to decide Guyger's fate.
"There was a few of us crying, and I really started crying, and I was listening to some people say they agreed with 28," Juror 21 said. "I asked for a lighter sentence."
"I'm a be honest and true," Juror 34 said, "I was like, 'I can't give her 28 years.'"
I think that was one of the hardest things I've ever had to do," Juror 34 told ABC News.
They were asking us to take an eye for an eye for Botham, and I feel like he isn't someone who would take an eye for an eye. He would turn the other cheek.
The jurors said that Jean was at the heart of their decision, but they also had to consider Guyger's show of remorse and the fact that the shooting was a mistake.
"I don't think Botham would want to take harsh vengeance," Juror 21 said. "I didn't feel like I had any right to speak for him, and he isn't there to talk for himself, but listening to how people talked about him, I felt like he would forgive her."
"They were asking us to take an eye for an eye for Botham," Juror 21 added, "and I feel like he isn't someone who would take an eye for an eye. He would turn the other cheek."
No matter how many years we would have gave Amber Guyger, it's not bringing Botham back," Juror 34 told ABC News. "It was a mistake, and the 10 years will be enough time for her to get back out there and try to do something better with her life."
Jurors in former Dallas cop Amber Guyger case speak out
Do they Drink and hit their wives too if so I agree with you ?I value him more the The Freedom of Religion People.
In an interview airing Friday on "Good Morning America," Juror 21 and 34, as identified by the court, revealed how they came to decide Guyger's fate.
"There was a few of us crying, and I really started crying, and I was listening to some people say they agreed with 28," Juror 21 said. "I asked for a lighter sentence."
"I'm a be honest and true," Juror 34 said, "I was like, 'I can't give her 28 years.'"
I think that was one of the hardest things I've ever had to do," Juror 34 told ABC News.
They were asking us to take an eye for an eye for Botham, and I feel like he isn't someone who would take an eye for an eye. He would turn the other cheek.
The jurors said that Jean was at the heart of their decision, but they also had to consider Guyger's show of remorse and the fact that the shooting was a mistake.
"I don't think Botham would want to take harsh vengeance," Juror 21 said. "I didn't feel like I had any right to speak for him, and he isn't there to talk for himself, but listening to how people talked about him, I felt like he would forgive her."
"They were asking us to take an eye for an eye for Botham," Juror 21 added, "and I feel like he isn't someone who would take an eye for an eye. He would turn the other cheek."
No matter how many years we would have gave Amber Guyger, it's not bringing Botham back," Juror 34 told ABC News. "It was a mistake, and the 10 years will be enough time for her to get back out there and try to do something better with her life."
Jurors in former Dallas cop Amber Guyger case speak out