“Finally, a small number of UCers decide not to complete birth certificates at all, preferring that the state remain completely out of their children’s lives.
We know that approximately 1-2% of the U.S. and Canadian population births at home.15 The number of UCs is certainly not in the tens of thousands.16 The maximum possible number of UCs per year in the United States is around 8,000, but it is likely lower than that. In 2005, the National Center for Health Statistics reported that 24,468 babies were born at home, based on birth certificate data; 14,677 of those births had a midwife in attendance, 7,233 home births had attendants listed as “other,” and an additional 790 attendants were recorded as “unspecified.”17”
https://ir.uiowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1387&context=etd
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thank you for that info, lots to read and I've only glanced through so far but notice this paper is based on information garnered from mothers within contact of medical services.
I was thinking more along the lines of people who live "off grid" though. Travellers, migrants, the homeless, etc. No registration, never seen a doctor and therefore not recorded. Maybe I'm thinking too much.