LisaB
Well-Known Member
GRACE: When we were told that -- when police wanted to look at his cell phone, he started deleting numbers, did he explain that to you?
DUNN: What he told me was, they wanted to see where he had called me at work. He showed it to them on his phone. They said, OK, gave it back to him, and they said show me again. And he says it wasn`t there.
My (sneaky) daughter was forbidden from seeing a boy named "Tommy" when she was 13, after she came home from school covered in BITE MARKS. She was "in love" with him and, of course, continued the relationship at school. One day she "disappeared" after school. Her phone had been taken away the night before when she was caught using it after the established "cut-off" time. In the end, it turned out she was at the home of "Tommy" which I learned when I called the person she had been speaking to "after hours" the night before and "Tommy" answered. In her phone, "Tommy"'s number was listed as "Becca". If (IF) Shawn was talking to someone he had entered in his phone as Billie (who was NOT Billie), at times he knew he had not spoken to Billie, he may have initially thought that showing them the call log that had calls to/from "Billie" would be enough to satisfy them. When they wanted to double check, he realized that Billie would not back him up on those dates and times, or, that LE would discover that the numbers listed under her name were not her numbers, since the person listed as Billie in his phone was someone else.
Did that make ANY sense?
OTOH, most phones allow you to store multiple numbers under a single name (home, work, cell) so calls to "Billie" made during times that she had "supposedly" left her cell for her kids to use while she was at work COULD have been to her work number and would still show up as "Billie" in his call log. So "why would he call her cell when he knew it was not with her"? Maybe he DIDN'T. Maybe he called ANOTHER number he had stored for her.