From the transcript I can't understand if it's Jean the hairdresser or her grandchild.
"But there's also another layd, jean burris, a neighbor of ours, whose grandchildren grew up with our kids, she says her granddaughter saw her monday between 10:30 and 12:00."
Jean burris says her granddaughter saw Hailey. Respectfully, which part do you not understand?
http://www.livedash.com/transcript/nancy_grace/5100/HLN/Monday_January_17_2011/549239/
Its all so disingeneous. Why put in the unnecessary information? Because things aren't confusing enough already. Why all the extra info hammering home how well known, akin to the Pope in supposed infallibility (per CZ's post at the end of the last thread), this woman is, when it was really some lady's grandkid?
***********************
On a related note:
I thought there was a forum for support for families to read if they wanted to without having to deal with & read the sleuthing. I don't think its fair to the very hardworking posters who have to pick things and people's words apart to be acussed of raking people across the coals. I don't have an agenda - I don't know Billie from adam, but when someone goes on national TV with glaring inconsistencies and an ever changing story and excuses... well, it makes me people question them. That is what this forum is for.
I stopped following the Zahra Baker case, but if it wasn't for people picking a part the step mother's affect, looks, inconsistencies etc etc., WS wouldn't have found out how far into that imvu website she was, and how twisted she really was. I'm sure if EB had any friends, they wouldn't have liked reading the stuff the fabulous, hardworking WSers found.
It is true that some topics have been talked about several times. I would say this is because new people are following the case and aren't going to go back and read the first 26 threads. It is also because the stories keep changing and the printed information from MSM and various websites (I hate the word "facts" and all the presumed objectivity that goes along with it) and transcripts need to be be dragged to the fore again and again.
Those of us who are scrutinizing the mom and questioning her stories don't want Hailey to be found any less than those who are "on the fence" (or on the other side of it!). We don't want the mom to be involved. We, just like everyone else, want Hailey to be found.