- Joined
- Aug 24, 2008
- Messages
- 5,425
- Reaction score
- 26,323
ah, but I'm used to the alerts. :floorlaugh:
hey, I'm a HUGE teh fan..one among many :fireworks:.... but I just couldn't resist! :floorlaugh:
ah, but I'm used to the alerts. :floorlaugh:
Oh my God I'm losing it! I could have sworn it said info obtained from "family and friends".
Thanks for pointing that out, SoulMagnet.
Reading it over again, though, I have to think that if the LEO was not convinced from whatever info he received, from whatever source it came, that there was a party on New Year's Eve, he would not have included it in the affidavit. There would be no point I can think of.
The LEO was trying to get a warrant for a car and 2 phones. He offered no PROOF (didn't need to,imo) to the "sworn statements". Just did snippets.
I, for one, would LOVE to see the sworn affidavits of BD and SA that the LEO refers to. Context, etc. It's sort of like taking snippets of the NG transcripts to FIT what "you" think/surmise/speculate about. It's about CONTEXT. JMO.
And why if Hailey was basically left to do what she wanted to, how did she know she needed to go to the police straight off the bat this time?
Nope not here u can't not unless they are determined to be POI named as SUSPECTS
Besides if there was a reason to really look at either of them..LE would be looking at them.
And why if Hailey was basically left to do what she wanted to, how did she know she needed to go to the police straight off the bat this time?
Because his daughter is not missing but Billie's is.
As reported, DD left his home with BD around 9:00 pm to spend the night with a friend on Dec. 26th (MONDAY). He saw HD playing with Xbox and THOUGHT she should play until around midnight depending on her level of play.
MONDAY... Dec. 26th. NOT Tuesday when (as reported) she told SA that she was going to her dad's house and then to MB.
Everyone needs to keep the days straight, IMO.
here's one timeline: http://www.reporternews.com/news/2011/jan/12/no-headline---hailey_dunn_timeline/?partner=yahoo_feeds
JMO
I agree with you and I noticed this the other day. Why all of a sudden the next day would she want someone to call HD when she didn't even check on her the night before. That bothers me too and makes no sense. jmo
What do we know really?? NO one has ever came out and said yeah they came and went as they pleased....are we assuming this to be the case??
Most teens are always on the go.
IIRC BD said she was irritated because HD didnt check with her first before going to MB for the night, Maybe she didnt call because she was irritated and didnt want to upset Hailey or maybe she didnt call to check on her because she had no reason to believe Haileys wasn't where she should have been
The sad part is we can pick apart and say I would have , She should have ect over lots of things but the truth is everyone lets thier gaurd down sometimes for instance how many people go grocery shopping and leave the child sitting in the cart while you are loading your groceries in the cart instead of putting your child in the vehicle first because groceries are replacable children are not...Simple things people every days dismiss and don't think about happen to even the best and MODEL parents.
She has access to Mark K., one of the best advocates and very media savvy...
LE has a lot Suspects until they are name we have to sit on our hands
I going to go off this post...
I can't believe that HUD would kick a family out within what 24 hours?
I don't know anything about HUB housing but I still think they got to give you more time than that. Does anyone know the rules on that?
Beside the fact that a child is missing and a small child in household..it doesn't seem very fair to put extra burden on a family.
Memo to Billie; telling everyone not to focus on SA isn't working. Now if LE says not to focus on SA...
I'm not trying to fit any part of this to anything. My quest is always to find out the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, of what happened to these little victims - no matter what that may be. I do my very best to be objective in that quest.
I do understand that this is merely a search warrant affidavit, and how the standard of proof differs from a trial.
All that being said, I see no reason for the LEO to have mentioned in the affidavit that there was a party unless he'd received information that convinced him that there was.
I see no signs that Shawn and Billie are being railroaded.
If the LEO was mistaken, or encounters additional info that changes his mind, I'm sure we'll eventually find that out.
For now, I think there was a party.
We can agree to disagree.![]()
Unbelievable! :maddening:
I kinda saw it coming though. First, LE was mean to Billie. Then, the public was mean to Billie. Now, Nancy Grace is mean to Billie. Nancy Grace picked up her story, undoubtedly helped her get more LE and exposure dedicated to her daughter, has treated Billie more softly and fairly than I think she actually deserved, criticized and took hits from LE for defending Billie, probably helped get MK to go and support Billie on behalf of her daughter.... And, now, Billie is complaining about Nancy Grace. Just unbelievable.
I think Billie knows that NG is on to her and she's afraid to go back on because she's been unable to keep her story straight from interview to interview. I don't think Billie will be back on NG.
No disrespect to anyone who agrees with Billie on this issue; I'm just floored that she's criticizing the local media (for publishing affidavits) and NG - two sources that gave her the most opportunity to help find her daughter (though she failed to take proper advantage of that exposure)...
May Hailey be found soon...